THE row over the salary packages awarded to university leaders comes as lecturers are on strike over pensions.
The dispute centres on proposals to end the defined benefit element of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) pension scheme.
Lecturers’ unions argue this would leave a typical academic almost £10,000 a year worse off in retirement than under the current set-up.
Younger academics could lose almost half of their total retirement income, say unions, but the employers’ group Universities UK says the scheme has a deficit of more than £6 billion which it cannot ignore.
And they said the industrial action is targeted at helping students because it is they who will suffer if education deteriorates due to employers being forced to make cuts to pay more into pensions.
Christine Haswell, national pensions official for the University and College Union, said: “Members of the universities pension scheme face the guaranteed element of their pension being axed. With strike action under way, universities across Scotland are facing the largest strikes and most substantial period of disruption they have ever faced.
“We are ready to take part in meaningful talks to resolve the dispute if we possibly can but, most importantly, we need university principals to stand up and bring the employers back to negotiations.”
A spokeswoman for Universities Scotland said about 10 Scottish institutions were affected by the UK-wide action.
She added: “Universities Scotland is not a party in this dispute, but recognises the need for universities to address the funding challenges facing USS.
“Universities’ immediate priority will be to try to minimise disruption to students’ education and to vital student services during that time.
“It is not yet clear what impact this will have in individual institutions but we will keep this under review.”
The action involves 14 days of escalating strikes over four weeks, beginning last Thursday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel