SCOTTISH ministers have insisted they hold no information on which military aircraft are using Prestwick Airport – or where they are being deployed.
Economy Secretary Keith Brown yesterday dodged a question on whether the airport had been used by US military aircraft for rendition flights or live missions to Syria.
But a Scottish Government spokesman later said the facility – which it bought for £1 in 2013 when it faced closure – was operated at arm’s length, adding: “The Scottish Government does not hold information on the purpose of aircraft using the airport.”
He said: “Handling private and military flights has been a part of Glasgow Prestwick Airport’s business for many decades.
“Ultimately, the UK Government’s Department for Transport and the Civil Aviation Authority are responsible for determining which airline or country is allowed to operate flights into the UK.”
Mr Brown was questioned after giving a statement at Holyrood on the airport, which has faced scrutiny over its hosting of military aircraft.
He insisted it is "legitimate" that Prestwick, along with "virtually every airport in the UK", accommodates military flights.
He said: "This [military flights] is a vital part of what the airport does, it has done it for decades and it will continue to do it in future."
Questioned on when the airport would be returned to private ownership, Mr Brown said: "We can't give a date for when we expect it to transfer back to the private sector.
"We do talk to anybody that shows an interest in doing that and we are seeing things moving in the right direction with the increase in turnover and the reduction in losses but it will take some time for us to achieve that."
He said he believes the 2032 date given previously by the management team is achievable and the airport could be returned to private hands before then.
Figures show Prestwick makes almost £1.1m a year from military air traffic – far more than it makes from general flights.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel