Russian propaganda agency Sputnik has hired a former Labour candidate who describes himself as a “loyal Corbynite”.
The Edinburgh-based organisation - accused by Nato of spreading “misinformation” - took on Chris Summers two years after he stood against now foreign secretary Boris Johnson in the 2015 general election.
Mr Summers is a respected former BBC correspondent and current Labour councillor who has not been accused of misreporting.
His appointment, revealed in The Times, sparked concerns because of his close links to Scotland Yard.
A Liberal Democrat MP , Tom Brake, said he would write to media minister Tom Hancock to ask about Sputnik’s relationship with the police.
Mr Brake said: “I have very strong concerns about the representative of an organisation like Sputnik, which I believe is working against liberal democracies, potentially being in the room when the deaths of Russian dissidents or investigations in to Russian organised crime are discussed.”
Some Labour politicians, including the party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, have appeared on Russian disinformation media channels.
Former Labour minister Ben Bradshaw last week said politicians should not appear on Kremlin media.
He said: “It pains me to say there are still some of these useful idiots on the left in British and international politics.”
The appointment of a Labour councillor by Sputnik comes after another Russian government media outlet, RT, commissioned a weekly chat show from former First Minister Alex Salmond.
The SNP last week gave its fullest yet condemnation of Russian propaganda channels, including RT and Sputnik.
The MP who stated the party position, Martin Docherty-Hughes, immediately came under fire from another current Sputnik employee with political links.
Former SNP staffer Mark Hirst tweeted that Mr Docherty-Hughes had “forgotten to take his Diazepam” and that the MP supported Ukrainian fascists.
Sputnik, which, among other controversial stories, has suggested MP Jo Cox may have been killed by EU supporters to sway the Brexit vote, said it was wrong to “undermine the qualifications and ethics of our reporters”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel