EVEN as a business editor, occupied on a daily basis with hard numbers and realities on the corporate and economic fronts, I found it utterly disheartening to read Fergus McCann’s open letter on Hampden Park, published exclusively by The Herald this week.
READ MORE: Hampden Park: An open letter by former Celtic owner Fergus McCann
Mr McCann is a fine businessman, and certainly laid the foundations for the financial success that Celtic enjoys today when he led the club.
However, when it comes to a Scottish national treasure such as Hampden, it was demoralising to read Mr McCann distilling the question of Hampden’s future and the location of the national team’s future games down in large part to financial considerations.
“Whatever way you do the arithmetic, Hampden Park is a liability, not an asset,” wrote Mr McCann.
He highlighted the amount spent on the south stand and roof in the 1990s, declaring that about £64 million of taxpayers’ money had gone into the project.
In the grand scheme of things, given Hampden is a national asset, it is important to keep the £64m in context.
READ MORE: Hampden Park: An open letter by former Celtic owner Fergus McCann
Countries with ambition should spend money on their infrastructure. When you consider what Hampden does for Scotland, £64m is not really such a big amount.
Hampden showed Scotland in its best light to many tens of thousands of international visitors during the Commonwealth Games in 2014. It also played its part in the London 2012 Olympics, when it hosted football.
We should also not forget the valuable employment created by Hampden, not just the regular staff but also, more importantly, the huge numbers of people working there on the days of Scotland matches or other big events.
Yes, the challenge with all big assets is to use them as much as possible, whether it be an aircraft or a football stadium. Hampden has enjoyed notable success in attracting major concerts such as U2 and The Stone Roses, and it would be good to see more on this front. It is a great venue for such events in the summer months.
READ MORE: Hampden Park: An open letter by former Celtic owner Fergus McCann
It is true, as Mr McCann observes, that there is a relatively small south stand crowd for Queen’s Park games. However, Hampden is the home of Queen’s Park, and it would be a great pity to see this tradition ended. Likewise, it is a very big deal for the vast bulk of senior Scottish clubs to win the honour of going to Hampden to play in a cup semi-final or final, with such visits giving fans memories that last a lifetime.
All of that said, the key issue is that Hampden is the home of Scotland’s national football team. Having watched Scotland play Georgia at Ibrox in October 2014, it was just not the same as being in the national stadium. The same would apply to Celtic Park.
There is much talk about how Ibrox and Celtic Park are somehow better in terms of atmosphere than Hampden but, from the perspective of a Scotland fan with little interest in the Old Firm, I find it impossible to concur with this viewpoint. From a personal perspective, the Georgia game was a good example of this.
READ MORE: Hampden Park: An open letter by former Celtic owner Fergus McCann
The national team should have its own home. And this should be its historic home. It is okay to play the odd, meaningless friendly at the likes of Pittodrie or Fir Park but not the big games that matter.
Murrayfield is for rugby. Ibrox and Celtic Park are for the Old Firm. Pittodrie is for Aberdeen, and Fir Park is for Motherwell.
Hampden is for Scotland and football. And its status as a national treasure – that has provided so many memorable nights for the Tartan Army and fans from around the world – should transcend any debate around mere financial aspects.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel