Miranda Heggie
IF THERE was ever a contest that embodied the phrase, "It’s not the winning, it’s the taking part", then the International Competition for Outstanding Piano Amateurs, held annually in Paris, would surely be it. Its founding president Gerard Bekerman started the competition in 1989 "to share with other people throughout the world the same passion as mine".
First and foremost, the event, in which amateur pianists from across the globe take part, is a declaration of love for the piano. Don’t let the word amateur fool you either. Although none of the entrants make their primary living as a pianist, the standard in the final was certainly as high as can be found in professional competitions, with past winners going on to release CDs and play with major orchestras.
Although one of the principles of the competition is the free choice of repertoire, it’s hardly surprising that a quick flick through the programme sees a generous smattering of Chopin and Liszt. Stalwarts of the competition repertoire, each of the five finalists offered a work by one of these composers; three of them works by both.
First to take to the keys was William Galton, a maths teacher at London’s Westminster School, who commuted each day to Paris from London. Opening with Schubert’s Impromptu no. 3, Galton’s execution was clear, measured and poised from the outset. It was, however, during the next two pieces – Chopin’s Waltz in A-flat major Op 42 and Scherzo in C-sharp minor op 39 – where Galton truly came into his own. His glassy, delicate, descending ripples in the Scherzo were beautifully balanced by strong, determined chords, as he lent a remarkable depth to this piece. For his final offering, Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsody no. 6, Galton’s syncopation was spot-on, as he made higher resisters of the instrument to really sing.
Following Galton was Israeli estate agent Eric Rouach. Ferruccio Busoni's piano transcription of JS Bach’s Chaconne, from his Partita no 2 in D Minor for solo violin, was given a meaty intensity, as Rouach teased out the rich dissonances with subtle rubato. His interpretation of Liszt’s one-movement piano sonata Apres une lecture du Dante was equally bold, the foreboding message of the piece’s inspiration – Dante’s Divine Comedy – shining through.
It’s not just the pianists that are breaking from their daily routine. A law lecture theatre in the Pantheon-Assas University in the south of the city had been transformed into a concert hall, providing a presumably temporary home to a Steinway concert grand. Perhaps then our third entrant might have felt somewhat at home – advocate general Julien Eyraud began his programme with a sumptuously tender Chopin lullaby, before bringing out a more fiery feeling in Liszt’s devilish Mephisto-Valse no 1.
Next up, Jean-Roch Le Henaff, a medical student at the university of Montpellier, gave a thoroughly musical rendition of Liszt's piano sonata in B minor. His tone was fresh and youthful, his playing bubbling with energy. The sonata’s tranquil ending is thought by some to have been a later alteration by Liszt, the original manuscript containing a scored out ending section which culminates in a loud flourish. Perhaps the composer’s former thoughts would have suited this performance better, since the spell Le Henaff had beautifully woven through the penultimate bars was tragically shattered by an errant mobile-phone. The rogue smoker in the audience though somehow added to the charm – after all, this is Paris!
Our fifth and final competitor was Zach Weiner, an information engineer for Google, hailing from California. Opening with Chopin’s Sonata no 3 in B minor, this was a technically flawless performance, although it could have done with a stronger dose of emotion. With subtle shifts to the rhythm, he construed a sway in the music, before delving into a totally different soundscape for Ligeti’s Etude no 6. The composer’s enchanting, blurry harmonies were at once intriguing and calming.
From 100 entrants, the pianists had been whittled down to a final 5 by a jury comprising esteemed soloists and teachers, including Rena Shereshevskaya, Simon Ghraichy and Tristan Pfaff, to compete for the top prize of €3,000 (around £2650) and a concerto engagement with Paris’s Orchestre de la Garde republicaine. While some had entered in previous years, the competition was a brand new experience for finalist William Galton. "I perform fairly regularly – little concerts, lunchtime recitals, that sort of thing. Someone mentioned this competition to me and I thought that it sounded like a really good challenge, a good goal to work towards. I feel I’ve learnt loads from preparing for it."
His hard work and preparation – and advance flight bookings – certainly paid off, as he was was deservedly awarded both first prize and the Press Award, from a jury of 10 critics from titles such as La Lettre du Musicien, International Piano, and, of course, The Herald.
Second prize went to Eric Rouach and 3rd to Jean-Roch Le Henaff, while Zach Weiner scooped the audience prize. As Gerard says though, "here, the desire to win is outweighed by the love of music", and indeed, the dedication to that art was the greatest triumph.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here