Scottish Natural Heritage has become the latest body to object to plans to build a new a golf course on the Sutherland coast.
The organisation has told Highland Council that the proposed development at Coul Links near Embo will harm plants and animals and will damage environmentally sensitive sand dunes.
SNH said that having considered all aspects, it is objecting to the proposal, submitted by American billionaire golf resort developer Mike Keiser, due to the extent of impact on the Loch Fleet Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
Nick Halfhide, SNH's director of operations, said: “We have worked closely with the developer on this proposed new golf course and appreciate the efforts they have made in trying to mitigate the environmental impact.
“We recognise the many benefits the development would bring to Embo and the local economy, and we welcome the developers’ commitment to high standards of construction and management.
“However, we are not able to fully support the development as proposed due to the loss of more than 16 hectares of nationally important sand dunes, and the impact on the special plants and animals found there.”
The development proposals include an 18 hole golf couse, a clubhouse and access roads but also a range of measures to improve the management of the site for nature although SNH said it did not believe those outweigh the permanent loss to the sand dunes.
The objection follows similar ones lodged by the National Trust for Scotland, the Scottish Wildlife Trust and RSPB Scotland.
A spokesman for STRI, the project managers, said the wildlife and conservation value of the site was a "critical factor" for the development team with specialists employed to minimises initial impact of the course and provide long-term biodiversity gain.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel