By David Goodwin
THE couple accused of murdering Margaret Fleming are set to try and overturn a decision to deny them bail.
Eddie Cairney, 76, and Avril Jones, 57, remain in custody after appearing separately at Greenock Sheriff Court on Friday afternoon when the case against them was fully committed for trial.
However, the Greenock Telegraph understands that lawyers acting for the couple are set to submit an appeal to the High Court in a bid to overturn the ruling of Sheriff David Hall to remand them in custody.
A hearing on the matter is likely to take place within seven days of the appeal application being made.
Cairney and Jones each face four separate charges in relation to the claimed abduction, assault and killing of Margaret and an alleged fraud said to total more than £180,000.
Prosecutors say that the duo locked Margaret in a room within their former home, Seacroft, in Inverkip, bound her arms and wrists with tape and held her captive against her will between November 1 1997 and January 5 2000.
It is alleged that between December 18 in 1999 and January 5 in 2000, while acting together, that by inflicting blunt force trauma on Margaret or means presently unknown, they murdered her.
The last independent sighting of Margaret — who was officially reported missing in October last year — was in December 1999.
The Crown claims that Cairney and Jones disposed of, destroyed or concealed her remains and pretended to authorities that she was alive in order to defeat the ends of justice, all between December 18 1999 and October 28 this year.
The pair are further accused of carrying out a £182,000 fraud by illegally claiming state benefits, disability payments and carers allowance on Margaret’s behalf while knowing that she was dead.
Cairney, represented by Greenock lawyer Aidan Gallagher, and Jones, represented by defence advocate John McIlroy made no plea during their separate hearings on Friday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel