IN UKRAINE they found a Scottish word for their former first family and its business: the “clan”.
Friends and relatives of ousted president Viktor Yanukovych did very well during his years in power.
His son Oleksandr , 44, was valued at a cool half a billion dollars before the so-called Maidan revolution swept his “papa” from power in 2014. His dad, whose opulent country home outside Kiev shocked the nation after his overthrow, was estimated to be worth 20 times more.
Both men are now in hiding in Russia as corruption cases proceed. The Yanukovych years ended in a separatist revolt, backed by Russia’s Vladimir Putin, that still simmers in his old homeland of eastern Ukraine.
It was on Mr Yanukovych’s watch that Ukraine suffered a boom in the marketing of off-the-peg “offshore firms”, including tax-free Scottish ones called limited partnerships or SLPs. Oleksandr is said to have had one. But so too did thousands of Ukrainians, for a whole variety of reasons, including fear of “asset grab” that corrupt authorities or business rivals.
This newspaper has documented scores of examples of the abuse of such Scottish entities by unethical businesses or criminal groups in Ukraine, including corrupt arms dealers.
And SLPs are still being sold online in Ukraine - and other parts of the former Soviet Union, despite new transparency rules in both the UK and Ukraine.
SLPs, of course, as we have reported, have also been used for mass money-laundering out of Moldova, Russia and Azerbaijan and as fronts for Israel’s binary options industry, essentially fraudulent online gambling.
But it is not just the Yanukovych clan in Ukraine which has been linked to SLPs. The husband of former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who stood against Mr Yanukovych in 2010 elections, previously declared an interest in an SLP.
That firm was called Toulouse Net. It has failed to name its “person of significant control” under new UK rules. It is not alone in doing so. SLP owners may just be one of the biggest “clans” of Ukraine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here