THEY were built more than 4,000 years ago and offer a fascinating insight into the lives of the Neolithic population.
But new research into the communities living on Orkney show that much like today, prehistoric people were riven with rivalries even back then.
The study, led by Professor Alex Bayliss of Historic England, challenges the previously understood narrative for prehistoric life on the islands.
By examining more than 600 radiocarbon dates, scientists were able to gather much more precise estimates of the timing and duration of events in the period around 3200-2500 BC.
The study, part of the wider project The Times of Their Lives, suggests there was a period which saw rivalries and tensions between households.
This was played out in how they buried their dead and in their communal gatherings and rituals.
The scientists now believe that two distinct and very different tribes first settled on Orkney more than 4,500 years ago.
But while one set of people settled from the Scottish mainland, another group arrived directly from Belgium and France which would have led to tensions as they lived in different ways.
For example, one set of Neolithic dwellers used flat pottery, while the other used more rounded ones.
Other differences are in the burial sites with the mainland tribe using stalled which have deep chambers covered in cairns. The European tribe preferred longer and flatter ones.
It is the first time that scientists have discovered there were two separate, distinct groups living on Orkney at the time and may help explain why the islands have so many townships scattered over a vast area as the tribes may have moved to get space away from the other one.
Ms Bayliss said: “People in the Neolithic made choices, just like us, about all sorts of things – where to live, how to bury their dead, how to farm, where and when to gather together – and those choices are just beginning to come into view through archaeology.
“We now have much more advanced carbon dating equipment and this helped us pinpoint that two different sets of people lived there at the same time and would have lived very differently.
“One came straight from Belgium and France and appear to have bypassed the rest of Britain entirely and headed straight to Orkney as there artefacts are totally different from those found in Aberdeenshire where most headed north from and are the same as those found in Europe.
“It’s an exciting time to be an archaeological scientist.”
Neolithic Orkney is well-preserved, with stone houses, stone circles and elaborate burial monuments.
The islands are home to renowned sites such as the Skara Brae settlement, Maeshowe passage grave, the Ring of Brodgar and Stones of Stenness circles, which were granted Unesco World Heritage status in 1999.
They have been joined by more recent discoveries of great settlement complexes such as Barnhouse and Ness of Brodgar.
The findings suggest the islands north of mainland Scotland were probably first colonised about 5,600 years ago, with settlements peaking between 3,100 BC and 2,900 BC.
After a drop in construction across Orkney between 2,800 BC and 2,600 BC, people appear to have started settling there once again.
Around this time it is likely the Ring of Brodgar was erected and brought people together into what was now a sacred - not domestic - landscape, according to the study.
Originally made up of 60 stones, the ring now has 27 and is 104 metres in diameter.
It was during this period researchers believe the island saw a period of competition between communities.
Professor Alasdair Whittle of Cardiff University, principal investigator of The Times of Their Lives, said: “Visitors come from all over the world to admire the wonderfully preserved archaeological remains of Orkney, in what may seem a timeless setting.
“Our study underlines that the Neolithic past was often rapidly changing, and that what may appear to us to be enduring monuments were in fact part of a dynamic historical context
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article