Homeowners could benefit from significant energy savings thanks to the first smart meter to provide personalised advice based on usage, scientists claim.
The iBert device, developed by a team at the University of Bath, uses a small number of cheap sensors to highlight where energy is being wasted in a home.
It then makes recommendations on how to save money, based on observing the energy usage of the home over the previous week or more.
Researchers say iBert is also the first smart meter to use simple language to communicate with homeowners about their energy usage.
The device calculates energy waste in terms of money, but also loss of tree cover, tons of carbon or cost to society to appeal to households with different motivations.
Unlike other smart meters, it contains a thermal model of the home and its occupants to provide accurate recommendations to reduce energy waste.
A test of iBert, which would cost an estimate £50 per household, saw gas consumption reduced by 22per cent overall and by more than 27per cent in high-usage homes.
Professor David Coley, of the University of Bath, said: “We have shown that presenting energy data and feedback in a clear and understandable way has a positive effect on the energy behaviour of home owners.
“For the first time, a smart metering system has been designed to help people learn what they need to do, and only interact with them if they might be being profligate.
“Current smart meters are being rolled out across the country at a cost of a staggering £11 billion but, through design, are limited in their ability to help reduce energy consumption. This needs to change.”
The Government aims to have smart meters installed in all homes and small business by the end of 2020, costing an estimated £11 billion.
But the researchers say meters currently being installed only result in small savings, in some cases providing inaccurate or inflated readings.
Current smart meters, or In-Home Displays (IHDs) generally just report energy consumption data, with more advanced models presenting this in monetary terms.
No devices provide personalised advice to homeowners about how best to make effective energy savings based on their own usage, the researchers add.
Their £1.5 million research project, lasting for four years and in partnership with Exeter City Council, involved testing iBert in 47 homes.
It found those using the device became better consumers of energy by being more educated about where energy was being wasted in their homes.
The mean temperature of homes was reduced from 22.4C to 21.7C, with gas consumption reduced by 22per cent overall and 27.2per cent in high-consuming homes.
Recommendations are presented via a smart phone or computer to show homeowners where they are being inefficient and how much money they could potentially save.
Dr Ian Walker, senior lecturer in the Department of Psychology at the University of Bath, added: “Through this extensive study, we have shown our design to be highly successful in significantly reducing household energy usage and bills.
“By presenting energy data clearly, we have proven it is possible to improve home owners’ energy literacy and in doing so, better understand how to change their energy behaviour and reduce their energy bills.”
The findings of the study have been published in the journal Building And Environment.
ends A spokesman for the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said: “Smart meters will put an end to estimated billing, provide near real-time information about energy use and help households keep bills down.
“There are already 7.7 million smart meters installed across Britain and eight in 10 people would recommend them.
“They are a vital upgrade to our energy system and will take £300 million off energy bills in 2020 alone.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here