There is no evidence that experimentation with e-cigarettes leads to teenagers taking up smoking tobacco, experts have said.
Rising popularity of the devices has led to heated debate in health circles, with some claiming that vaping is a one-way street to taking up smoking.
But new analysis has concluded that most e-cigarette experimentation among young people does not lead to regular use.
And levels of regular e-cigarette use in young people who have never smoked remain very low, according to the study - a collaboration between the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Public Health England, Action on Smoking and Health, and the Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement at the University of Cardiff.
Researchers examined data from five large-scale surveys conducted between 2015 and 2017 involving over 60,000 11 to 16-year-olds across the UK.
Regular - at least weekly - use of e-cigarettes amongst all young people surveyed was 3% or less, they found.
The authors said this use was "highly concentrated" in those who also smoked tobacco.
Among young people who have never smoked, regular use of e-cigarettes was between 0.1% and 0.5% across the five surveys, they said.
"Recent studies have generated alarming headlines that e-cigarettes are leading to smoking. Our analysis of the latest surveys from all parts of the United Kingdom, involving thousands of teenagers shows clearly that for those teens who don't smoke, e-cig experimentation is simply not translating into regular use," said Linda Bauld, professor of health policy at the University of Stirling - which is a member of the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies.
"Our study also shows that smoking rates in young people are continuing to decline. Future studies on this subject need to continue to monitor both experimentation and regular use of e-cigarettes and take into account trends in tobacco use if we are to provide the public with accurate information."
Martin Dockrell, tobacco policy manager, Public Health England, added: "The findings in this study suggest that in terms of protecting children we are broadly getting the balance right in the UK.
"We have a regulatory system that aims to protect children and young people while ensuring adult smokers have access to safer nicotine products that can help them stop smoking. This includes a minimum age of sale, tight restrictions on marketing, and comprehensive quality and safety requirements. We will continue to monitor the trends in e-cigarette use alongside those in smoking."
Deborah Arnott, chief executive of the campaign group Action on Smoking and Health, said: "A small proportion of young people do experiment with e-cigs, but this does not appear to be leading to regular vaping or smoking in any numbers, indeed smoking rates in young people are continuing to decline."
Debate over the devices rumbles on.
A study published earlier this month suggested that among English teens, "ever use" of e-cigarettes is associated with initiation of cigarette use.
The study, published in the journal Tobacco Control, reporting findings of a survey of 2,300 13 and 14- year-olds conducted across 20 schools in England. The pupils were then surveyed again a year later.
Researchers found that among those who had never smoked cigarettes but had tried e-cigarettes when they were first polled, a third (34.4%) said they had tried cigarettes 12 months later compared with only 9% in the group who had not tried e-cigarettes at baseline.
Concerns have also been raised about the chemical components of e-cigarettes.
But Public Health England's independent review of the latest evidence states that while vaping "may not be 100% safe, most of the chemicals causing smoking-related disease are absent and the chemicals which are present pose limited danger".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here