A specialist family court lawyer has called for the urgent introduction of "no fault" divorce.
Ayesha Vardag, founder of law firm Vardags, said the pain and distress caused by protracted divorce proceedings was unacceptable in modern society.
She was speaking after research suggested that married people who had heart attacks were more likely to survive that single people.
"The pain and distress caused by bitter, protracted divorces is unacceptable in a modern society," she said.
"The tragic consequence of a cruel, blaming divorce is often that one loses not only a sexual partner but also a dear friend and supportive companion or co-parent.
"The answer is not to imprison unhappy or ill-suited people in their marriages but to urgently facilitate a less acrimonious, no fault, more financially straightforward divorce, coupled with better access to counselling ... to help those dealing with depression or anxiety about the end of the relationship.
"Emotional pain, however it arrives, hits us as human beings very hard. We need to take the anger out of the equation and look after each other, even our ex-partners, and thereby enable caring and supportive extended family units to survive divorce."
A recent report by academics at Aston University said marriage was a "vital factor" affecting the survival of patients who have had a heart attack.
Aston Medical School researchers said a study showed that married heart attack patients were 14% more likely to survive than those who were single.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here