A SECOND Liberal Democrat MP is facing questions over their General Election spending after an investigation by the Herald.
Christine Jardine, who gained Edinburgh West in one of the toughest contests in the country, disregarded thousands of pounds of costs on her official candidate declaration.
Her party also sent local voters personalised mail which was not accounted for in her filing.
Despite the LibDems’ saturation campaign in Edinburgh West, with households inundated with leaflets, Ms Jardine claimed she ultimately spent less than her SNP rival.
This relied on her saying a third of her bill for election material was “national” spending, on the grounds it promoted the LibDems in general, rather than her as the local candidate.
If this £3000 of expenditure had been counted toward her constituency campaign costs, the former BBC reporter would have been £1350 over the legal spending cap.
The Herald revealed yesterday that Jo Swinson, deputy leader of the UK LibDems and MP for East Dunbartonshire, is also facing questions over her campaign costs.
She too split spending down national and local lines, and declared around £2700 of leaflets, some 93,000 items, went undelivered in her party’s top Scottish target seat.
The SNP said just Ms Swinson’s decision to assign £309 of her election address costs to national spending could have put her over the limit, as such costs are always local.
It is an offence punishable by a year in prison to knowingly submit a false spending return.
A key member of Ms Jardine’s campaign was the local MSP Alex Cole-Hamilton, who was also the chair of the Scottish LibDems’ election campaign.
On the eve of polling, Mr Cole-Hamilton was the subject of a police report to the procurator fiscal over alleged overspending in his 2016 campaign for Holyrood.
SNP MP Pete Wishart said voters in Edinburgh West would be “astonished” by the LibDem figures after being bombarded by the party’s mail throughout the campaign.
He said: “Clearly they’ve learnt nothing from the embarrassment of a police investigation into election expenditure last year. Again it appears they’ve shuffled around thousands in costs to keep below the spending threshold.
“There’s a very troubling pattern emerging here in relation to the Lib Dems’ treatment of strict electoral rules. The consequences could be serious indeed if they haven’t played by the book. Voters deserve to know what’s going on.”
A LibDem spokesman insisted all spending had been correctly apportioned.
The fight in Edinburgh West was one of the ugliest of the General Election.
LibDem-held since 1997, the seat was won by the SNP’s Michelle Thomson in 2015 by 3120 votes, and the LibDems made its recapture a priority, pouring in activists and resources.
The party ruthlessly exploited Ms Thomson resigning the SNP whip over an alleged financial scandal - later dropped by the Crown - to undermine the Nationalists.
As the antagonism between the sides grew, an SNP activist repeatedly attacked Ms Jardine online on the day of her husband’s funeral.
Scottish LibDem leader Willie Rennie accused the party of being “vicious” and “very low”.
Ms Jardine went on to win by 2988 votes.
In December, the Electoral Commission imposed a maximum £20,000 fine on the UK LibDems for failing to declare hundreds of items of spending at the 2015 general election.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel