THE multinational oil companies that run the Mossmorran petrochemical complex in Fife are facing a legal crackdown for breaching pollution limits and endangering health after nine days of “unplanned” gas flares.
ExxonMobil and Shell are also being beset by demands for an independent inquiry into their ageing plants, which suffered a series of breakdowns last month. The worst incident resulted in a large pall of thick black smoke over Fife on June 18.
Both companies have been accused of “showing contempt for the community” by failing to turn up for a packed public meeting in Lochgelly Town Hall on July 5. Angry residents also attacked public agencies for failing to do enough to protect them from pollution, noise and vibrations.
ExxonMobil runs a plant at Mossmorran near Cowdenbeath converting ethane gas into ethylene for the plastics industry. An adjacent plant run by Shell separates the ethane from other gases piped in from the North Sea.
The plants regularly discharge large amounts of gas from their stacks. According to the latest official figures, in 2015 they flared 13,507 tonnes of gas as well as releasing 23 tonnes of benzene, which is known to cause cancer. But last month there were equipment failures at both the ExxonMobil and Shell plants that caused a large amount of unplanned flaring. An ExxonMobil pump breakdown on June 12 triggered flaring until June 17.
Then an unspecified “process upset” at the Shell plant on June 18 started a second bout of flaring that lasted until June 20. According to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa), that flaring included “a large smoke cloud for an extended period of around 30 minutes".
Sepa has launched a major legal investigation into the flaring, and will be conducting formal interviews with company staff. “It was prolonged, it was very unsatisfactory and we’re investigating potential breaches of the permit,” Sepa’s area manager, Rob Morris told the public meeting.
“We will be looking at the permit conditions that apply to these operators with a view to taking action.” Actions could include formal warnings or undertakings, enforcement notices, fines or prosecutions, he said. “None are off the table.”
Sepa, which received over 80 complaints about the flaring, declined to say whether any pollution rules had been broken. It added that it was “currently satisfied that the emissions from the Mossmorran complex are not having a detrimental impact on air quality in the local communities.”
NHS Fife, however, has said that the black smoke emissions breached one of Mossmorran’s operating conditions, and had been linked to breathing difficulties and irritated eyes.
NHS Fife was taking the matter “very seriously”, according to public health director, Dr Margaret Hannah. It had convened a meeting of public agencies to confirm that Sepa was investigating “what appears to be a breach in the way the ethylene plant is permitted to operate”.
The public meeting was organised by the newly-formed Mossmorran Action Group, which pointed out that residents had been suffering noise, pollution and health impacts for 32 years. “The ritual apologies from ExxonMobil and Shell don't wash any more,” said the group’s chair, James Glenn.
He accused Sepa of lacking the legal teeth and manpower to monitor and control emissions. “We are calling on the Scottish Government to hold a full independent investigation into the cumulative social and environmental impacts of Mossmorran,” he told the Sunday Herald.
The Labour MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Alex Rowley, also demanded an independent review into “the workings, processes and current condition” of the complex. “We also need a review of the monitoring of the discharge of chemicals into the air we breathe in the surrounding towns and villages,” he said.
The local Green MSP Mark Ruskell argued that the two companies had refused to engage locally and should be “held to account” by the Scottish Parliament. “Shell and ExxonMobil are showing contempt for the community,” he said.
“It’s just one example of the health and wellbeing of local communities being sold out to big industry in Scotland.”
Friends of the Earth Scotland demanded “serious penalties” to deter the companies from polluting again. “Massive clouds of black smoke floating across Fife can be good for no-one,” said the group’s director, Dr Richard Dixon.
ExxonMobil and Shell both stressed that the best mechanism for dialogue with the local community was a community safety committee set up over 30 years ago. They said that flaring was an essential “safety valve” and they did all they could to keep it to a minimum and learn from incidents.
ExxonMobil said it was working closely with Sepa’s investigation and would be “delighted” to meet elected representatives. “We apologise to our neighbours for the flaring incidents,” said a company spokesman. “We recognise that these events caused concern and inconvenience.”
Independent monitoring had shown that emissions from Mossmorran “have no significant impact on air quality in the local communities and meet national and EU air quality objectives,” he added.
Shell said that the “process upset” at its plant had caused “intermittent flaring” but had been within legal limits. It had not resulted in any danger to staff or local communities and relevant authorities had been informed, a company spokeswoman said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel