ONE man who will not take part in the public hearings of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) was nevertheless a significant presence at its opening day.
Frank Docherty, one of the pioneering child abuse survivors, who helped set up the campaign group Incas (In Care Abuse Survivors Scotland) and whose determination helped bring about the public inquiry, died suddenly in late April. Like too many victims, his time simply ran out before he could hear answers or see justice in respect of abuse suffered in state care.
He had, however given written evidence to the inquiry and the SCAI’s lead solicitor Colin Macaulay QC devoted most of his opening statement to allowing Frank to speak from beyond the grave. It was a poignant tribute, not least given his comments about other abuse victims who have died. “Incas used to have more than 400 members,” Mr Docherty said, “But every time we send a newsletter out, we are contacted to say another member has passed away.”
Mr Docherty also wrote about his hopes for the SCAI. “What I want out of the inquiry is justice for children who suffered abuse,” he said. “The way we were treated took away our self-esteem, it was humiliating and damaging. My childhood has been taken away from me.”
John Scott QC, Incas’ solicitor said it was fitting that Mr Docherty’s words were heard at the first hearing, while Lady Smith in her opening remarks said she was deeply sorry the inquiry could not hear from him in person. He was “determined and unwavering” in his commitment to justice for abuse victims, she said. “It is a tragedy he won’t be here for the public phase of the inquiry he fought so hard for.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here