AN ASBESTOS expert has warned that the number of men dying from a lethal lung disease caused by exposure to the mineral is likely to triple over the next 30 years.
Robin Howie said official predictions had "vastly underestimated" the death toll from mesothelioma, an incurable cancer, because they fail to take account of future improvements in life expectancy.
Mr Howie, an Edinburgh-based occupational hygienist who advises on health and safety, said that the expected surge in people living into their 80s and older meant that increasing numbers of men would survive long enough to develop mesothelioma, whereas past generations tended to die earlier from other illnesses. The condition takes 42 years on average to develop after initial exposure.
Mr Howie forecasts that between 2014 and 2049, there will be a total of 130,000 male mesothelioma deaths in Britain, compared to around 50,000 between 1969 and 2014.
Speaking at an asbestos conference in Glasgow yesterday, he said: “This is not going away. We are not even at the beginning of the end. And at some point, the government of the day are going to have to face it.”
Mr Howie's predictions are around double the official estimates of the Health and Safety Executive, which previously said it expected male mesothelioma cases to peak in 2016, before gradually dropping off. In total, the HSE predicts that mesothelioma will kill around 91,000 men between 1968 and 2050.
However, Mr Howie stresses that this has ignored the effect of the ageing population, which will drive incidence "through the roof".
In a paper presented at yesterday's conference, he wrote: "Given that men aged over 70 accounted for 72 per cent of male mesothelioma cases in 2013 the predicted increase of the number of men over that age over the next four decades suggests that mesothelioma numbers are going to continue to rise, and rise sharply, for many years ... It is relevant to appreciate that men in their 80s in 2030 would have been in their 20s in 1975 and could have worked with, or worked in the vicinity of others working with, materials such as asbestos insulating boards or asbestos insulation products."
Mr Howie added that cases of mesothelioma in women were also "heavily under-diagnosed", but that he expected to see an upsurge in diagnoses among nurses and teachers who had been exposed to airborne fibres in schools and hospitals built using asbestos.
Asbestos was long considered a "magic material" in the construction, shipbuilding and manufacture industries, where it was used for insulation and fire-proofing. The link with mesothelioma was first identified in Nazi Germany in 1943 but dismissed for decades. The UK finally outlawed the import and use of 'blue' and 'brown' asbestos in 1985, followed by 'white' asbestos in 1992, but Mr Howie said the public had been let down by the UK's failure to enforce an EU Carcinogen Directive that would have set strict limits for airborne asbestos.
He said air quality in schools should not exceed 100 asbestos fibres per cubic metre.
He added: "We need to define sensible limits and we need to stick to them, but it shouldn't be the taxpayers who foot the bill for failure. I would have the government officials responsible for enforcement paying compensation out of their own pension pots. That would give them the incentive to get the job done."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel