A French court has convicted the man known as "Carlos the Jackal", once the world's most-wanted fugitive, of a deadly 1974 attack on a Paris shopping arcade and sentenced him to life in prison for the third time.
The Venezuelan-born Ilich Ramirez Sanchez is already serving two life sentences in France for murders and attacks he was convicted of perpetrating or organising on behalf of the Palestinian cause or of communist revolution in the 1970s and 80s.
His lawyers, who had pleaded for acquittal, said they will appeal the latest verdict - though the third life sentence does not affect how long he will stay behind bars.
A few hours before the decision was returned, the 67-year-old known worldwide as Carlos took the floor one last time and denounced "an absurd trial" for a 42-year-old crime.
He had denied involvement, saying there was no proof against him or direct witnesses.
Five judges found Carlos, the only defendant in the case, guilty of throwing a grenade into a shopping area in the French capital's Latin Quarter.
Two people were killed and 34 injured at the trendy Drugstore Publicis.
The lawyer for the two dead victims' families, Georges Holleaux, said that "today we are extremely relieved".
"The evidence exists, it's overwhelming, it was recognized (by the court) and justice is done," Mr Holleaux told reporters.
"Today's verdict is proof that there is nowhere, never, impunity if one is ready to fight. Let perpetrators of terrorist crimes know it: now the victims will never give up."
The case took so long to go to trial because it was first dismissed for lack of evidence.
It was reopened after Carlos was arrested by French intelligence services in Sudan in 1994 and imprisoned in France.
His lawyers introduced challenges at every stage of the proceedings.
After the verdict was returned, one of Carlos's lawyers, Francis Vuillemin, argued the trial should never have been held because the case was beyond the normal statute of limitations.
"The media truth has permeated the judicial truth. The magistrates didn't dare acquit Carlos. Let's meet again in one year, for the appeal trial and for a new performance in this justice drama," Mr Vuillemin added.
The Drugstore case, the oldest one formally blamed on Carlos in France, is also probably the last one to come to court, since he is not being investigated by French authorities for any other attacks.
When the police arrived at the scene on that day in September 1974, they found a devastated mall with all the windows shattered, multiple bloodstains and a hole in the marble slab of the ground floor where the grenade fell.
The two men who died were hit by metal chips that perforated vital organs and caused large internal bleeding, according to court documents.
Prosecutor Remi Crosson du Cormier had asked the court to give Carlos a life sentence, the harshest sentence in French law, for "the horror of this terrorist attack".
In a long interview published in Al Watan Al Arabi newspaper five years after the attack, a man presented as Carlos allegedly claimed he had himself thrown the grenade, telling the full details of the operation and the reason why it was carried out.
Carlos later disputed he had ever given that interview.
At the time of the attack, Ramirez Sanchez had not yet been dubbed Carlos the Jackal or become one of the most notorious international terrorists of those decades.
He was 24 years old and already had joined the organisation Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
It was in the name of the Palestinian cause that he subsequently became the military chief of the PFLP in Europe, claiming the "operational and political responsibility" for all the operations of the group on the continent and also for "all the wounded and all the dead," according to court documents.
In one of his most dramatic operations, he led a commando that attacked a meeting of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries in Vienna, Austria, in late 1975.
He took more than 60 hostages, including 11 Opec ministers. Three people were killed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article