The future existence of the Labour Party is at risk, deputy leader Tom Watson has warned amid claims that hard left supporters of Jeremy Corbyn are plotting a takeover in a secret deal with Unite union boss Len McCluskey.
Mr Watson said it was clear the threat was real after a recording emerged of the founder of Momentum - the grassroots activists group which helped propel Mr Corbyn to the leadership - discussing the prospects of gaining Unite's backing.
Jon Lansman was said to have told supporters he expected the union - together with the Communication Workers Union (CWU) - to affiliate to Momentum if Mr McCluskey wins his battle for re-election as Unite general secretary.
READ MORE: Pound a starting point for an independent Scotland's currency, says First Minister Nicola Sturgeon
Warning that such a move could "destroy" Labour, Mr Watson said he would raise the matter with Mr Corbyn.
Mr Watson said he did not know if Mr Corbyn was aware of the Momentum situation.
The deputy Labour leader told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: "They organised for him, but I'm not sure if Jeremy knows there's a secret plan. I'll be raising it with him today.
"I'm going to talk to him about it, I don't know what he knows and doesn't know.
"I'm the deputy leader and I didn't know about it until I heard this recording. And I regard this as a battle for the future existence of the Labour Party. This is high stakes.
"What Jon Lansman has outlined is a plan with Len McCluskey, the leader of Unite, to take control of the Labour Party."
Mr Watson said he wanted the Labour leader to "deal with" Mr Lansman.
"The significance of this is that we have never seen the biggest union organising a political faction within the Labour Party with the tacit approval of the leadership," Mr Watson said.
Responding to initial attacks from Mr Watson, Mr Lansman said: "For 20 years the left was denied a voice. We will deny a voice to no-one. We face big challenges and we need our mass membership to win again."
The row erupted after The Observer obtained a tape of Mr Lansman's remarks, which were said to have been secretly recorded at a meeting of a newly-formed Momentum branch in Richmond, south-west London, earlier this month.
He is quoted as saying: "Assuming that Len McCluskey wins the general secretaryship, which I think he will, Unite will affiliate to Momentum and will fully participate in Momentum, as will the CWU."
He went on to tell activists it was "absolutely crucial" that they secured a change to the party's rules to ensure that whenever Mr Corbyn stands down, they are able to get a candidate on to the ballot paper to succeed him.
Currently, a candidate must obtain the support of 15% of Labour MPs and MEPs in order to stand - a threshold a new left-wing contender is unlikely to be able to achieve.
Momentum insisted there were no current plans for Unite to affiliate and said it had not received any funds from the union.
A spokesman said Mr Lansman had been speaking in "an aspirational manner" about the possibility of Unite and the CWU affiliating to Momentum.
A Unite spokesman said: "As Unite has stated, repeatedly, it is for the Unite executive council, not the general secretary, to agree to which bodies our union aligns. There are no plans whatsoever for Unite to affiliate to Momentum, as has, again, been made repeatedly clear.
"It is extraordinary that the deputy leader of the Labour Party continues to interfere in Unite's democracy in this way."
READ MORE: Pound a starting point for an independent Scotland's currency, says First Minister Nicola Sturgeon
Momentum director and member of Labour's national executive committee Christine Shawcroft told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I think there is a democratic deficit in the Labour Party where the structures of the party don't reflect the support for Jeremy Corbyn which has been shown by the mass of the members.
"This is about democratising the Labour Party, which will strengthen the Labour Party.
"It's no threat to the position of the Labour Party and the strength of the Labour Party.
"The only thing it might destroy is people who feel entitled, in a very undemocratic way, to control what the members are able to vote on in the end."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel