THERESA May sacked George Osborne as revenge after the former Chancellor tried to oust her when she was Home Secretary, according to a new biography of the Prime Minister.
Osborne was said to have been angered by May's low-key support for the Remain campaign in last year's EU referendum.
He was so frustrated by her "submarine" tactics, he told a number of allies she could end up being demoted, according to claims in Theresa May: The Enigmatic Prime Minister by Rosa Prince.
However, it was Osborne who was sacked from his post when May finally made it to No 10 and one of her first acts as Prime Minister was to remove him from the Treasury and the Cabinet.
Commenting on the claims, former cabinet minister Eric Pickles said: "We had that ridiculous thing where Osborne was going to have her sacked because she wasn't doing enough. By God, she put him in his place."
Osborne was said to have been hoping to carry on in a senior Cabinet role, despite previous disagreements with May during her time as Home Secretary.
An ally is quoted as saying: "He wanted the Foreign Office. There was some speculation that he could even stay on at the Treasury – he'd have done that." Instead, he was told that there would be no place for him at the Cabinet table in a conversation that lasted just 10 minutes.
Afterwards, the book claims, May's aides were almost certainly responsible for letting it be known that she had given him a severe dressing down, telling him he needed to show more humility if he ever wanted to be the top job.
His dismissal was said to have followed a number of earlier clashes, mainly over immigration, with the then-chancellor arguing for a more relaxed approach to economic migration.
At one cabinet meeting in 2012, Osborne was said to have "declared war", describing the "horror story" of a Chinese businessman with millions to spend on British products who had been stopped at Heathrow, where he was interrogated for hours and subjected to a full strip search.
He said on his release the man had returned on the next flight to China where he told his friends to avoid the UK and demanded to know who was responsible for this "debacle".
May, whose department was responsible for the Border Agency, was said never to have forgiven him. One minister in her current Cabinet said: "She couldn't stand him after that."
Osborne was not the only minister with whom she was said to have fallen out. Michael Gove was another to pay the price for a long-term feud.
May, who blamed him for a bitter clash over Islamism in schools that led to the sacking of one of her closest aides, dismissed him as Justice Secretary in a conversation lasting just two minutes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here