US media outlets have hit back at claims by Donald Trump that reporters lied about the size of crowds at his inauguration.
The president has warned a "big price" will be paid by those who said fewer people turned out to watch him take the oath of office than when Barack Obama was sworn in for the first time eight years ago.
White House press secretary Sean Spicer described the reports as "shameful" and said: "This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration - period. Both in person and around the globe."
Read more: Theresa May unlikely to bring up sexism on US visit
The comments have provoked outrage among US media outlets.
The New York Times said Mr Trump's team had made "false claims" while CNN headed their article "White House press secretary attacks media for accurately reporting inauguration crowds".
Pictures shared on social media appeared to show acres of empty space on the National Mall, where an estimated 1.8 million people stood to see Mr Trump's predecessor in 2009.
The number of journeys on Washington's Metro system on Friday also failed to match that of recent inaugurations.
As of 11am, 193,000 trips had been taken, according to the service's Twitter account.
At the same time eight years ago there had been 513,000 trips and by 11am on the day of Mr Obama's second inauguration there had been 317,000 journeys.
Read more: Theresa May unlikely to bring up sexism on US visit
Mr Trump's team has reacted fiercely to reports that the ceremony failed to draw the huge crowds expected.
"I made a speech. I looked out. The field was - it looked like a million, a million and a half people," Mr Trump said during a press conference at the CIA headquarters in Virginia on his first full day in office.
He criticised one network which reported just 250,000 people had turned up.
"That's a lie," said Mr Trump, adding: "So we caught them. And we caught them in a beauty. And I think they're going to pay a big price."
And on Sunday he hailed television ratings for the ceremony, tweeting: "Wow, television ratings just out: 31 million people watched the Inauguration, 11 million more than the very good ratings from 4 years ago!"
Mr Spicer told reporters that the area between the Capitol building and the Washington Monument, just over halfway down the National Mall, held approximately 720,000 people.
"All of this space was full when the president took the oath of office," Mr Spicer said.
He also said that white flooring, which had been used for the first time to protect the grass, had highlighted empty space in the crowd.
But the same covers were also used four years ago, it has been claimed.
Read more: Theresa May unlikely to bring up sexism on US visit
The National Park Service stopped providing crowd estimates in the 1990s, meaning the exact number of attendees may never be known.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel