Hundreds of harrowing first-hand accounts of the first day of the Battle of the Somme, written by the men who fought in it, are to be made public for the first time.
The mostly hand-written experiences of the Tommies who went over the top on July 1 1916, give a breathtaking insight into the death, chaos and devastation of the bloodiest day in British military history.
Almost 60,000 British and Commonwealth soldiers were killed or wounded on July 1 and there would be more than a million casualties on both sides by the end of the 141-day offensive, 100 years ago on Friday November 18.
The reminiscences, written more than half a century on from the conflict for an author writing about the battle, have been donated to the Imperial War Museum and will be added to its online records of British soldiers who fought on the battlefield in Northern France.
Anthony Richards, head of documents and sound at the IWM, said the accounts ranged from some short and quite basic accounts, to others that were "like a chapter from a book".
He said: "It's a real cross-section, officers and men. It covers people from all sorts of backgrounds, under age soldiers...one who even changed his name in order to get in.
"They cover all the different experiences on the first day. Most of them cover the feeling of being in the trench, getting ready to go over the top.
"But then some people talk about being wounded straight away, others talk about being captured and taken as a prisoner of war, others talk about actually reaching the enemy trenches and having hand-to-hand combat. You get the complete cross-section really.
"All these accounts were written in the late 1960s and this was 50 years after the events they are talking about.
"But the vast majority are still very, very detailed and I think that shows you how important those events were to these people that they can remember really small details.
Among those in the IWM collection was that of Private John Kirkham, a 20-year-old in the 20th Battalion Manchester Regiment in 1916, who described attacking a German soldier with a "knobkerrie", a steel-headed club used in hand-to-hand fighting.
He wrote: "I hit out with my knobkerrie and it sank deep into his forehead, in the scuffle, his helmet flew off, and I saw that he was a bald-headed old man. I have never forgotten that bald head, and I don't suppose I ever will (poor old devil)."
Another correspondent was Lance Corporal Charles Bartram, 23, who had been at the front with his mortar unit for a matter of weeks.
He described seeing his senior officer killed by a sniper right in front of him as they waited to go "over the top", before adding: "Zero hour (mortar) dismantled all ready to go over, then the word came to retire, we retired through the tunnel back to the reserve trench, most of the time on our hands and knees over dead and dying, from that moment all my religion died, after that journey all my teaching and belief in God had left me - never to return."
The stories were written for author Martin Middlebrook for his book, The First Day On The Somme, first published in 1971.
He appealed for first-hand accounts in over 90 local and national newspapers and, in response, 526 British and 20 German veterans gave Middlebrook their personal recollections.
But he only used around 10 for his book and now the British accounts have been donated to the museum by the Felix Fund, a charity which helps military and police personnel who have worked in bomb disposal units.
They were given in memory of Holly Angharad Davies, who passed away in 2014 and was awarded a British Empire Medal for her work with the charity.
Over the coming month, the accounts will be added to Lives Of The First World War, IWM's online "permanent digital memorial" to British and Commonwealth service personnel in the First World War.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here