THOUSANDS of people have backed a Labour MSP's proposals to scrap laws aimed at tackling sectarianism in football.
The consultation on James Kelly's Members' Bill to repeal the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act attracted 3,248 responses.
Over 70 per cent back repeal of the legislation covering offensive behaviour at football matches, while more than 60 per cent of respondents also back the repeal of laws governing threatening communications.
The Act, which came into force in 2012, criminalised offensive and threatening behaviour, including sectarian behaviour, related to football matches and any communications containing threats or incitement to religious hatred.
The SNP used its majority in the last Scottish Parliament to pass it, despite a lack of opposition support.
The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Greens all back its repeal.
Critics say the Act is flawed and has damaged trust between police and football fans.
Mr Kelly said his consultation has had the most "unique responses" in Holyrood history, with thousands of individuals having their say.
"The people have had their say, it's time to scrap the SNP Football Act," he said.
"The SNP were arrogant to bulldoze this piece of legislation through Holyrood in the first place. Every other party opposed it.
"Academics, lawyers, football clubs and football fans opposed it, yet the SNP wouldn't listen and used their then majority in the Scottish Parliament to rail-road the Football Act through.
"Having lost that majority, and faced with clear public support for repeal through the consultation process, it would be incredibly arrogant if the SNP do not now think again.
"I will take the next steps in the legislative process. The SNP should consider dropping their support for this bad law, and backing my Bill."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Scotland continues to have a problem with abusive behaviour at football games which tarnishes our national game.
"A hardcore minority is souring the atmosphere for the majority of football supporters and critics of the Act seem to think our only option is just to accept this contempt for fans and players.
"Not one viable alternative to dealing with the unacceptable scenes of violence and abuse we continue to see at matches has been put forward in the entire debate around this law.
"This is not just about sectarianism or language that can be challenged by education programmes - two-thirds of charges under the law in 2015/16 were for threatening behaviour, including physical violence.
"After two full football seasons of the Act being in place, an independent evaluation found that the clear majority of fans condemn abusive behaviour towards people's religious beliefs."
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokesman Liam McArthur said the Act was a "knee-jerk reaction".
He added: "It was a blunt response which puts our civil liberties at risk.
"Ministers must instead move towards a more holistic approach to tackling sectarianism which involves broader action, working with communities, local authorities, churches, football clubs and more."
Greens MSP John Finnie said his party would be working with others to get the Act repealed "as quickly as possible".
He added: "There is no place for sectarianism in Scottish football, however Scottish Greens believe that the Football Act unnecessarily restricts freedom of expression and is not the most effective means of addressing these concerns."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel