THE former chair of the campaign that delivered the Scottish Parliament has said Westminster should impose a “super-majority” on the next independence referendum.
Nigel Smith said setting a threshold of 55 per cent for a successful Yes vote, for example, would show there was a national consensus for radical change better than a majority of 50 per cent plus one.
Writing in the Herald today, Mr Smith, who led the successful Yes-Yes campaign for Holyrood and devolved taxation in 1997, said there was no evidence of such a consensus at present.
READ MORE: The PM's divisive stance may force the break-up of the Union
Given the rest of the UK would not have a say on Scottish independence, he said Theresa May would be right to insist upon proof of consensus through a higher threshold for Yes.
In the 1979 vote on a Scottish Assembly, the Yes side won the most votes, but was denied victory as less than 40 per cent of the electorate as a whole had voted for devolution.
The notorious 40 per cent rule, devised by the arch devo-sceptic Labour MP George Cunningham, meant people who didn’t vote at all effectively helped defeat the Assembly plan.
READ MORE: Theresa May should heed latest inflation rise
Mr Smith’s proposal would be different: a 50 per cent-plus threshold among those voting.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel