EXAMINERS have admitted that a computing exam sat by thousands of Scottish pupils contained coding errors.
This summer’s National 5 computing science exam provoked a backlash from teachers who said it was of the worst ever set.
In the immediate aftermath the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) denied there was a problem saying feedback had been positive.
Read more: World’s first large-scale show of forces' 'unmanned technology'
When the issue was raised at the Scottish Parliament the body then admitted to “a small number of typographical errors”.
Now an official report into the exam by SQA experts has revealed there were “coding errors” in the exam as well as mistakes in the way questions were worded.
The report highlighted a particular problem with one question stating it “contained an error which did not allow this question to be answered as it was originally designed”.
It also reveals that, after marking the exam, the SQA adjusted the boundaries between grades to ensure no candidates were disadvantaged.
The admission comes months after computing science specialists launched an outspoken attack on the qualification highlighting problems with 19 out of the 21 questions.
Teachers described the paper as one of the worst ever set and called for the SQA to hold an inquiry.
Critics highlighted confusing questions, questions with multiple possible answers and some where knowledge would have been required from outside the course, such as the legislation around cloning of phones.
Read more: World’s first large-scale show of forces' 'unmanned technology'
Following the concerns the issue was raised in the Scottish Parliament and John Swinney, the Education Secretary, told MSPs he had “made clear his discontent”.
He added: “I think, frankly, that is not good enough, these issues should be checked properly, there is adequate opportunity for this to be done and I have made clear my discontent about that to the chief examiner.”
The controversy comes at a difficult time for computing science in schools with falling teacher numbers and concern the importance of the subject to the future economy is being ignored.
In 2014 it was revealed that the number of computing science teachers in Scotland has dropped sharply, sparking fears for the future of the subject. One in eight secondary schools in Scotland does not have a computing science specialist at all.
The concerns about the National 5 computing science paper came to light in a number of internet forums used by specialist teachers.
One teacher from a high profile Edinburgh private school described the paper as “the most error-strewn and, in places, incomprehensible examination I’ve seen in my career”.
Read more: World’s first large-scale show of forces' 'unmanned technology'
He said: “It contains typos, incorrect code and other errors which make questions unanswerable.
“It is strewn with grammatical errors, it requires knowledge which is not in the course and some questions are so poorly designed and worded even the most able of candidates could well be defeated by them. There has clearly been insufficient quality assurance.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here