IT was the curious tale of Nelson Mandela, the “prancing” Gay Gordons and the freedom of the city of Aberdeen.
The details, albeit scant, are contained in the latest release of previously secret Foreign Office papers from the 1980s.
At the time, the future South African president was in prison. While venerated as the hero of the struggle to end the apartheid system in his country, the then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher associated Mr Mandela with communism and terrorism because of his leadership of the ANC.
In November 1984, Whitehall mandarins hesitated when they were approached by officials from the Ministry of Defence with an unusual request. They were asked if they had any objection to the Gordon Highlanders taking part in a ceremony in which the prisoner on Robben Island was to be given the freedom of the city of Aberdeen.
Initially the Foreign Office took a relaxed view.
One official, Miss A Adams, wrote: "Music, colour and pageantry is generally supplied on such occasions by the Gordon Highlanders, who are based in the city. MoD have asked whether there would be any objection to the Gay Gordons performing and prancing on this occasion too.
"I recommend that we do not object," she added.
But writing in the margins of the typed note, another unnamed FO official had a different take and penned a word of warning. "The association of a Scottish band of the British Army with the ceremony would certainly attract comment in SA. All in all, it seems unwise."
Miss Adams later wrote that the MoD was now having “cold feet,” adding: "I recommend that we tell MoD we have no objection and leave them to decide."
The records do not say how the issue was resolved but it is believed the Gordon Highlanders, who performed traditional Scottish dances, never did perform or prance on this occasion.
In November 1984, Mr Mandela and his then wife, Winnie, were given the freedom of Aberdeen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel