RANGERS have raised concerns about "factual inaccuracies and contradictions" in the SFA-commissioned report into the Scottish Cup Final disorder.
Hibs triumphed 3-2 to win the trophy for the first time in 114 years, but the post match celebrations were marred by scenes of crowd disorder and a pitch invasion.
Sheriff Principal Edward Bowen QC says in the report that he wasn't "qualified" to pass judgement on certain aspects of what happened.
READ MORE: Make pitch invasion a criminal offence says SFA report into Scottish Cup final trouble
In the report, he said: "I am not qualified to comment, nor would it be appropriate for me to do so, on the adequacy of the overall police numbers and the nature of their deployment."
But later he says there should there have been a reserve of Police Officers available to deploy across the centre of the pitch once an invasion took place.
Rangers said it is now seeking an urgent meeting with the author of the report, the Scottish FA’s chief executive Stewart Regan and his compliance officer, Tony McGlennan to discuss their concerns.
READ MORE: Make pitch invasion a criminal offence says SFA report into Scottish Cup final trouble
The club said: "It is imperative that we gain insight into the underlying basis for the findings in the report given that we consider it contains a number of factual inaccuracies and contradictions.
"It is right that the club gives the author and requisitioner of the report the opportunity to comment on our concerns prior to making a conclusive statement.
"It is to be hoped that the Scottish FA, as they begin considering this report and the appropriate punishments, remember vividly what actually occurred... at the National Stadium when Hibernian fans were allowed to invade the field of play and attack Rangers players and staff, who were offered little protection."
READ MORE: Make pitch invasion a criminal offence says SFA report into Scottish Cup final trouble
Describing the events of the final, Sheriff Bowen said: "Whilst the vast majority of Hibs supporters who went onto the pitch did so in a spirit of jubilation a small number, probably no more than 200, behaved in a manner which went well beyond a manifestation of high spirits," he said.
"There were incidents involving direct physical confrontation with Rangers players which included the hurling of obscene language and sectarian abuse. Similar conduct was directed at Rangers officials.
"There were incidents of wilful, direct and abusive defiance of lawful instructions given by police officers at the time of the pitch invasion. None of this can be justified on the basis of high spirits.
"There was evidence that in the course of the match sections of the crowd in West Stand merited greater police attention than those in the East. This was because of the discharge of pyrotechnics and the singing of sectarian songs. "
The West End was the part of Hampden that the Rangers fans were.
READ MORE: Make pitch invasion a criminal offence says SFA report into Scottish Cup final trouble
He went on: "That said, when the pitch invasion occurred the overwhelming majority of Rangers supporters behaved properly and many simply left the stadium. A small number allowed themselves to be taunted by the Hibs fans to the point of invading the pitch for the purpose of physical confrontation."
He also said the cause of the invasion was an "exceptional high degree of excitement generated amongst Hibs fans".
He said: "The principal cause of the pitch invasion was the exceptionally high degree of excitement generated amongst Hibs fans by the scoring of what was almost certainly a decisive goal when the match had seconds left, against a background of an unsuccessful season and a long period since the club had been successful in the Scottish Cup."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel