Scotland’s biggest ever public inquiry, into the abuse of children in care is genuinely independent and a new chair will be appointed as soon as possible, John Swinney has told victim and survivor groups.
At a meeting with survivors of childhood abuse held in the wake of the resignation of two of the three key figures at the head of the investigation, the Deputy First Minister attempted to reassure them that the troubled investigation is still on track.
He was pressed to explain why he had taken steps to remove the former Chair Susan O’Brien QC – which eventually led to her resignation - and why another member of the three person panel leading the official probe had also resigned. Both quit citing government interference as the causes and warning that the independence of their work was being compromised.
However Mr Swinney told survivors that he had moved to remove Ms O'Brien because of comments she had made which he feared would upset them and cause great offence if they had been made public.
Mr Swinney agreed to consider appointing a judge or a candidate from outside Scotland to replace Ms O'Brien and said he would look again at whether the remit of the inquiry could be extended to encompass groups currently excluded.
After yesterday’s gruelling two and a half hour meeting, survivors appeared to have been placated by reassurances, but said the resignations from the inquiry had rocked confidence in the Government.
Alan Draper, spokesman for In Care Abuse Survivors Scotland (INCAS) said: "It being suggested that survivors have lost confidence in the Child Abuse Inquiry. We have not lost confidence in the Inquiry Team, but the government.
"Mr Swinney has committed himself that the inquiry will be totally independent and he is prepared to reconsider the remit to cover organisations with a duty of care [where abuse occurred].
"We have been reasonably reassured but a lot of questions remain to be answered. We also want a commitment from the inquiry team themselves that they remain fully independent of government."
Mr Draper said survivors representatives had asked Mr Swinney if he regretted acting hastily in pressing Ms O'Brien to resign. "We feel he took precipitous action, as a result of pretty flimsy evidence," he said.
David Whelan, another prominent campaigner for survivors of abuse suffered within the charity Quarriers, said victims were fed up and distressed by years of waiting for answers: "This has gone on long enough - it is time for Scotland to face up to its responsibilities", he added.
"The deputy first minister has given us these assurances and we will wait on the outcomes. We have been assured the inquiry will be independent and impartial but we have been let down in the past.
"We have to wait now for the appointments process to happen."
Earlier in the day Mr Swinney had said that he recognised that the events of the last week had caused survivors great anxiety and upset. He added: "The Scottish Government remains absolutely committed to this inquiry and its work uncovering the truth of what survivors have experienced; how the people they should have been able to rely on could have been able to fail them so badly and how we make children today safer as a result of what we establish."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel