MICHAEL Gove, the leading Brexiter, has publicly apologised for comparing economic experts warning about Brexit with the Nazis who smeared Albert Einstein in the 1930s.
The embarrassing eve-of-poll move came after David Cameron, in his strongest attack yet on his friend and cabinet colleague, claimed the Scot had "lost it" and had made a "massive mistake" in drawing the comparison.
Apologising for the comments, which he made on LBC radio on Tuesday, Mr Gove said: "Yesterday, I was asked a question by Iain Dale about the predictions of doom for the economy. I answered, as I often do, with a historical analogy. It was clumsy and inappropriate.
"Obviously, I did not mean to imply anything about the motives of those who have spoken out in favour of staying in the EU.
"Throughout the campaign I've avoided making personal attacks; I'm sorry for speaking so clumsily and apologise for giving offence.”
The Justice Secretary added: “Britain will be more prosperous if we end our connection to the euro project and I should have answered this question directly."
His apology came shortly after support was expressed by fellow Leave campaigner Boris Johnson, who himself courted controversy just weeks ago by mentioning how the EU and Adolf Hitler wanted to create a European superstate albeit by different means.
The former London mayor said: "Michael Gove has run an absolutely fantastic campaign and he is right in what he says; some of these experts, they totally failed to foresee the crash of 2008."
Mr Gove sparked outrage when he claimed experts could not always be trusted and pointed to the German scientists used to denounce Einstein to prove his point.
Noting how people had to be careful about making historical comparisons, the frontbencher nonetheless then said: “But Albert Einstein during the 1930s was denounced by the German authorities for being wrong and his theories were denounced and one of the reasons, of course, he was denounced[for] was because he was Jewish."
The Secretary of State’s comments came after the group, Economists for Remain, put out a statement by 12 Nobel laureates and more than 175 UK-based economists warning that leaving the EU was a danger to the British economy.
The group's organiser, Eric Beinhocker, an economist at Oxford University, said: "Independent fact-based experts are essential to the functioning of a democracy. It is one thing for Michael Gove to disagree with us but it is another for him to call us Nazis.
"Do we really want political leaders who denigrate experts because they challenge their political views?” he asked.
Mr Beinhocker added: "It may be inconvenient for Michael Gove but the independent IMF and OECD and the 12 Nobel laureates and over 175 UK economists who signed our statement all say the same thing: Brexit would hurt growth and jobs, raise prices, and leave less money for government services."
The Prime Minister also criticised Mr Gove for his choice of words, telling Sky News: "To hear the Leave campaign today sort of comparing independent experts and economists to Nazi sympathisers…they have rather lost it.”
He went on: "These people are independent; economists who have won Nobel prizes, business leaders responsible for creating thousands of jobs, institutions that were set up after the war to try to provide independent advice. It is right to listen."
Mr Cameron also told LBC: “I'm afraid the Leave campaign here are making a massive mistake."
Meantime, sharing a campaign platform with the PM in Bristol, Sir John Major made yet another strong attack on the Leave campaign, branding its supporters the “gravediggers of our prosperity,” and insisting that if Britain left the EU, then “they must account for what they have done”.
In a clear swipe at Mr Gove and his fellow Brexiter Boris Johnson, the former premier said Mr Cameron had faced abuse from people "we might have expected better from".
Quitting the EU, claimed Sir John, would not stem immigration but risked creating a “broken Britain,” possibly with Scotland voting to become independent.
He said Brexit would diminish the UK’s international standing, adding: “A truly Great Britain shrunk down to a little England perhaps without Scotland, perhaps with a grumpy Wales, and certainly with a Northern Ireland divided from the south by the border, the controls that would then be the edge of the European Union."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel