IMF chief Christine Largarde has urged British voters to have the “courage” to vote the right way next week, leaving little doubt that this means rejecting Brexit.
In a speech in Vienna, Mme Lagarde insisted the IMF had adopted a “neutral” position but then referred to a previous assessment by the international body, backing Remain, and said: “We have already been on record that the economic risks of leaving are firmly to the downside. There is a clear case as to how the UK has benefited and will continue to benefit from its membership in the European Union.”
She explained that being part of the EU had greatly helped the “transformation of the UK” into a dynamic and vibrant economy.
“The UK,” she said, “has benefited from the many contributions of talented and hard-working migrants from all over the world, including the EU, while providing record-high levels of employment for all its residents.”
Mme Lagarde recognised that as in all countries, there were people who were struggling in this new globalised environment, but stressed that for the majority of citizens, it had been a “great success story”.
However, she noted how too many Europeans were worried about their cultural identity, their security, their jobs, incomes, and living standards.
“And too many of them,” added the IMF chief, “are led to believe that things would be better if only Europe returned to closed borders and economic nationalism.
Amid the self-imposed restriction on referendum campaigning Vote Leave hit back with its chief executive Matthew Elliott saying: “The IMF has chosen to ignore the positive benefits of leaving the EU and instead focused only on the supposed negatives.
“If we Vote Leave, we can create 300,000 jobs by doing trade deals with fast growing economies across the globe. We can stop sending the £350 million we pay Brussels every week. That is why it is safer to Vote Leave,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel