Labour is embroiled in a fresh storm over its response to anti-Semitism after the suspension of MP Naz Shah over offensive social media posts.
The West Bradford MP was stripped of the parliamentary whip and barred from party activity pending an investigation of her behaviour - which David Cameron branded racist.
Read more: Labour to finish behind the Tories according to latest Holyrood poll
Opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn had initially delivered only a reprimand, arguing that while the comments - made before Mr Shah was an MP - were "offensive and unacceptable", Ms Shah did not hold discriminatory views.
But under pressure from senior Labour figures to take disciplinary action amid mounting concern about anti-Semitism within the ranks - and with the Prime Minister joining calls for her suspension - it was announced Ms Shah had been excluded.
"Jeremy Corbyn and Naz Shah have mutually agreed that she is administratively suspended from the Labour Party by the general secretary," a party spokesman said.
"Pending investigation, she is unable to take part in any party activity and the whip is removed."
The leadership was also forced to deny editing an article written by Ms Shah for Jewish News - one of a string of apologies issued by the MP - to remove direct references to anti-Semitism and wider issues in the party.
Read more: SNP official quits party over sexist slur row with Labour candidate
BuzzFeed news said it had seen an original version drawn up by the MP's office which included an admission that she had "helped promote anti-Semitic tropes", which did not appear in the version on the publication's website.
A spokesman for Mr Corbyn said: "We have never seen those words. The article was the work of Naz Shah."
The party said the article was "not seen, written, edited or approved by Labour HQ".
Ms Shah, who yesterday quit her role as a Parliamentary assistant to shadow chancellor John McDonnell yesterday, told MPs she deeply regretted the hurt caused by the posts and wanted to work with Jewish groups to bolster understanding.
In a 2014 Facebook post, she shared a graphic of Israel's outline superimposed onto a map of the US under the headline "Solution for Israel-Palestine Conflict - Relocate Israel into United States", with the comment: "Problem solved".
The Guido Fawkes website - which published the post - also pointed to another made before Ms Shah was an MP, which used the hashtag #IsraelApartheid above a quote saying "Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal".
"Anti-Semitism is racism, full stop. As an MP I will do everything in my power to build relations between Muslims, Jews and people of different faiths and none," she told the Commons.
Ms Shah wrote in Jewish News that she wished to make an "unequivocal apology for statements and ideas that I have foolishly endorsed in the past".
"The manner and tone of what I wrote in haste is not excusable. With the understanding of the issues I have now I would never have posted them. I have to own up to the fact that ignorance is not a defence."
Buzzfeed said that the original article had been cut to remove a passage where she said that "we on the left must stop procrastinating and tackle oppression within our own ranks, especially anti-Jewish oppression."
In another change, "referencing Israel in comparison to Nazi Germany" was replaced with "referring to Israel and Hitler".
MP John Woodcock said: "This is incredibly serious - feel sick if this is as reported. Needs full explanation of whether true and who edited."
Ken Livingstone - the former London Mayor who is a close ally of Mr Corbyn - said the remarks were not anti-Semitic and the suspension was unnecessary.
He told LBC Radio: "What we have at the moment is a lot of people making a big issue about anti-Semitism in the Labour Party. In 47 years I have never heard anyone say anything anti-Semitic.
"We expelled a couple of people from the Labour Party early on for saying things that could clearly be interpreted as anti-Semitic.
"This is not that; this is an over-the-top comment about the horrendous conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians."
Conservative candidate for London mayor Zac Goldsmith said that Ms Shah's comments reflected a wider problem within Labour which was making the party "unelectable".
Mr Goldsmith told the Press Association: "A lot of people say silly things and regret it, a lot of people make mistakes - but these comments are not accidental, they are about as offensive as it is possible to be to the Jewish community.
"These are words that are deliberately designed to bring back memories of the Holocaust, which is completely unforgivable in my opinion.
"This is not just about her (Ms Shah). There is a problem in the Labour Party with anti-Semitism, and the Labour Party - if it wants to be treated as a respectable and serious party - has got to deal with that problem, and I don't believe it is.
"The Labour Party as a whole needs to get to grips with this issue. This is a once-great party and in my view it renders it unelectable."
Labour MP John Mann said Mr Corbyn should personally clarify if "someone at the top of the Labour Party" had "watered down" the apology.
"I want him to clarify - if that happened, who did it?
"Obviously he will want to sack that person. If someone has watered down what I take - on face value - to be a very genuine apology ... that would be a huge scandal," he told Sky News.
He said Ms Shah should be forced to take "a proper education programme on anti-Semitism" and to visit Israel to see the Holocaust memorial and a village bombed by Hamas rockets.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel