Parents have not only rights but responsibilities when choosing names for their children, a senior judge has said.
Lady Justice King - who sits in the Court of Appeal - says unusual and bizarre forenames can lead to children being bullied and trigger resentment.
She analysed the implications of names after the Court of Appeal was asked to consider a case in which a woman wanted to call her daughter Cyanide and her son Preacher.
The woman, who has been diagnosed with a mental health problem, said it was her "human right" to "exercise my right to choose their names".
But a judge ruled against her following a hearing in a family court and three Court of Appeal judges - Lady Justice Gloster, Lady Justice King and Lord Justice David Richards - have upheld that decision.
"It may be thought that any individual who has had the happy experience of debating with his or her partner possible forenames for their unborn child would be astonished at the proposition that the choice of the name of their child could be regarded as other than their right as the child's parents and their first act of parental responsibility," said Lady Justice King - in a section of the appeal court ruling called What Is In A Name?
"If a baby cannot be brought up by his or her parents, often the forename given to him or her by their mother is the only lasting gift they have from her.
"It may be the first and only act of parental responsibility by his or her mother. It is likely, therefore, to be of infinite value to that child as part of his or her identity."
Lady Justice King - whose forenames are Eleanor Warwick - added: "The naming of a child is not however merely a right or privilege, but also a responsibility; people, and particularly children, are capable of great unkindness and often not accepting of the unusual or the bizarre.
"It does not need expert evidence or academic research to appreciate that a name which attracts ridicule, teasing, bullying or embarrassment will have a deleterious effect on a child's self-esteem and self-confidence with potentially long-term consequences for him or her. The burden of such a name can also cause that child to feel considerable resentment towards the parent who inflicted it upon him or her."
The woman at the centre of the appeal had said Preacher was a "strong spiritual name" and a "rather cool name" which would "stand my son well for the future".
She said Cyanide was a "lovely pretty name" which was "linked with flowers and plants" - and she said Cyanide was "responsible for killing Hitler" and therefore a "positive" name.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here