Northern Ireland's Attorney General has lodged an appeal against a High Court ruling that declared the region's strict abortion laws incompatible with human rights legislation.
John Larkin is to challenge Mr Justice Horner's judgment in the Court of Appeal.
The judge's landmark ruling last year had potentially paved the way for the relaxation of the current prohibition on women accessing terminations in cases of rape, incest or where there is a diagnosis of fatal foetal abnormality.
The judge's declaration of incompatibility did not immediately lift the current ban but had placed an onus on the Stormont Assembly to legislate on the contentious issue.
Judge Horner had ruled the failure to provide exceptions to the law in certain limited circumstances breached a woman's right to privacy.
In cases of fatal foetal abnormality (FFA), the judge concluded that the mother's inability to access an abortion was a "gross interference with her personal autonomy" and where a sexual crime has occurred the judge said a disproportionate burden was placed on victims.
Unlike other parts of the UK, the 1967 Abortion Act does not extend to Northern Ireland where abortions are illegal except where the life or mental health of the mother is in danger.
Anyone who performs an illegal termination could be jailed for life.
Judge Horner made the ruling in a case taken by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission against Stormont's Department of Justice (DoJ).
The Attorney General's office confirmed an appeal had been lodged.
Amnesty International pledged to resist any attempt to overturn the judge's ruling.
Amensty's programme director in Northern Ireland Patrick Corrigan said: "The High Court made a very clear ruling that laws governing abortion in Northern Ireland breach the human rights of women and girls. That important ruling stands and we stand ready to resist any attempt to overturn it."
He added: "The Assembly must bring Northern Ireland's abortion laws into the twenty-first century and into line with international law as a matter of urgency."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article