JOHN Swinney has not delivered a budget of giveaways.
That would be hard when the Scottish Government's spending power is being cut by one per cent next year.
But his ninth spending plan as Finance Secretary was not a budget of take-aways either.
Despite much pre-budget talk of hard choices, he refused to raise extra revenue by using Holyrood's new power over income tax and he maintained the council tax freeze for another year.
Popular, but costly universal entitlements, including free university tuition, free personal care for the elderly, free prescriptions, free bus passes for older people and free school meals for the youngest primary school pupils were also left untouched.
Mr Swinney said his spending plans would "help family budgets".
For Labour it was a pre-election budget to keep voters happy, and a missed to combat Chancellor George Osborne's austerity programme.
The same point was made, in very different terms, by the Scottish Conservatives, who welcomed Mr Swinney's refusal to increase the size of the Scottish budget by a significant amount.
Where Mr Swinney did increase tax, the sums were modest in the context of his total £30.3billion spending.
That will come as little consolation to larger businesses that were stung for an extra £130million through the rates.
Those looking to purchase a second home will also have to pay more tax as a result of changes to LBTT, the stamp duty replacement introduced earlier this year.
The increased rates, mirroring changes made in England, will generate between £17million and £29million extra.
The biggest winner was the NHS, which will receive an extra £500million next year, a 6.5 per cent rise taking total spending to nearly £13billion.
There was extra cash, too, for affordable housing and the SNP's flagship plan to expand free childcare.
Budgets for schools and colleges were protected.
The biggest loser was local government, where total spending was cut from £10.8billion to 10.2billion, a reduction of 5.6 per cent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel