THE Scottish Government's flagship policy of free tuition for Scottish university students has helped cement social inequalities, experts have warned.
Academics from Edinburgh University said there was no evidence free tuition had increased access to higher education for pupils from the poorest backgrounds.
And they concluded that public investment would be better targeted at raising attainment in schools in the most deprived areas of Scotland - with a graduate tax one way of raising additional funds for the university sector.
The conclusions, brought together in a new book entitled Higher Education in Scotland and the UK, are a public challenge to the Scottish Government's support for free university tuition.
Successive SNP education ministers have argued that free tuition means a university education is "based on the ability to learn, not the ability to pay".
However, in her concluding chapter to the book Professor Sheila Riddell, from Edinburgh University's Moray House School of Education, argues that the policy has not been given sufficient scrutiny.
She said: "Despite political rhetoric surrounding free higher education in Scotland, the system has failed to produce more egalitarian outcomes compared with the rest of the UK.
"Universities in Scotland have flourished over the past decade, but the fact that they have been prioritised for funding over schools and colleges has had some unwelcome consequences in terms of reproducing existing social inequalities."
Mrs Riddell said the most important factor affecting the success of students from different social classes was their attainment at school, but highlighted the fact that councils are having to cut school budgets at a time when university teaching grants have been given relative protection.
She added: "There is strong evidence to suggest that if Scotland wishes to improve university participation by students from the poorest backgrounds, the most effective way of doing this is to target resources on schools in the most deprived neighbourhoods. This may call for a re-examination of funding priorities across the entire education sector."
"A progressive graduate tax, as well as means-tested student support, might be a more effective way of promoting social equality in higher education. However, this would involve greater critical scrutiny of universal free higher education and..... this has not been encouraged."
However, Vonnie Sandlan, president of student body NUS Scotland, said the preservation of free university education was vital.
She said: "While free education isn’t an end in itself to achieving fair access, it’s one important part of getting there.
"The idea that abolishing free education – a clear recognition of the public and social good provided by higher education – would improve fair access seems bizarre.
"We recognise, however, that free education can’t just be about the price tag, and we need to ensure the necessary financial support is available to keep students in education."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said young people from deprived areas in Scotland were now more likely to participate in higher education by the age of 30 than they were in 2006/07.
She added: "Our commitment to free tuition, the prospect of the lowest average debt and the best graduate prospects in the UK saw a record number of Scots accepted to study at Scottish universities in 2015/16.
"But we recognise there is more to do to engage all children and young people in education and improve literacy. That’s why we launched the Scottish Attainment Challenge, backed by the £100m Attainment Scotland Fund.
"We have been very clear that we want every child, whatever their background, to have an equal chance of benefitting from higher education if that is their choice."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel