It is "verging on the patronising" to suggest Holyrood is not capable of holding power of abortion law, Scottish Secretary David Mundell has insisted.
The cabinet minister clashed with former shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper as heated debate on the Scotland Bill continued in the Commons.
The Government plans to devolve power over abortion law to the Scottish Parliament as part of a package of measures aimed at delivering the Smith Commission.
Mr Mundell told MPs he felt devolving the power was part of the right balance to the overall devolution settlement in the UK and the Scottish Government has made clear it has no intention of changing the current law.
But Ms Cooper questioned whether it was right to allow the possibility of abortion law being different in different parts of the UK.
She said: "You are proposing a very substantial change to the framework for abortion legislation. You have done no proper, substantial consultation and we are going to have just a few minutes to discuss - such a big change to the 1967 Abortion Act.
"Do you really think a few minutes' discussion between officials, between the Scottish Office and the Scottish Government, is the right way to do this?"
Mr Mundell said: "I'm starting from a point that I believe the Scottish Parliament has the capacity to deal with this issue and I think it is in danger of verging on the patronising to suggest the Scottish Parliament is not capable of dealing with this issue, even though it is an issue of great importance, even though it is an issue of conscience."
He added: "There is no constitutional reason not to devolve abortion. The Scottish Parliament has responsibility for most aspects of the NHS and the criminal justice system."
Ms Cooper intervened again and added: "Do you realise what you are doing is setting up two different systems for Scotland, and England and Wales. When we know in other parts of the world that has led to people having to travel for abortions... at a vulnerable time.
"That issue of principle, deciding whether or not it is right for people to have to travel, is an important one."
Mr Mundell said: "I don't think there is any evidence to suggest that will be the case."
He added: "Simply by devolution there will be no change to the position under the 1967 Act."
Other amendments moved by Mr Mundell include a power to top up tax credits, child benefit and universal credit.
He said this would allow the Scottish Government to reverse controversial plans to cut tax credits - stalled two weeks ago by the House of Lords - if the SNP's opposition to the cuts was sincere.
Earlier, the Government won a series of votes on report stage amendments, including on a Labour call for an independent review of full fiscal autonomy, and SNP proposals on the Sewell Convention and devolving the power to call independence referendums.
The Scotland Bill debate began in a heated fashion as the SNP insisted not enough time had been given to debate the hundreds of amendments tabled from across the Commons.
SNP front bencher Pete Wishart said: "Scotland is watching these proceedings and it will just not understand the gross disrespect shown to our nation... it will feel like Scotland has been given an almighty slap in the face and told to just get on with it."
Mr Mundell earlier insisted: "The amendments put beyond doubt the Bill fully delivers the Smith Commission agreement."
The Bill came about as a result of "The Vow" made by David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg shortly before the end of the Scottish independence campaign.
The Scotland Bill proposes handing new powers from Westminster to Holyrood, with the promise of more control over taxation, VAT revenues and welfare spending.
The cross-party Smith Commission was established to look at how to deliver the additional powers promised by the then three party leaders.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here