HE was one of the most divisive figures of the referendum and the general election.
Whenever he spoke from his trademark Irn Bru crates, former Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy was sure to attract a crowd, hecklers ... and sometimes even an egg.
He was equally divisive inside the party, where his Blairite past antagonised left-wing MPs and union leaders, most notably Unite general secretary Len McCluskey.
But despite a proven track record for generating friction, Murphy has now landed a job as a globe-trotting peacemaker - drawing on his experience in the referendum.
His current role with the Finnish non-profit organisation Crisis Management Initiative (CMI) is advising on “conflict resolution in central Asia”.
In September, Murphy, a former Europe minister and Scottish secretary, took part in a CMI workshop for government officials in the Armenian capital Yerevan.
Local media reported the title of the event as “The Complexity of Peace Processes: Learnings from Northern Ireland and Scotland cases”.
Murphy was quoted saying the legacy of violence in Northern Ireland made peace very hard.
But he went on: “In case of Scotland we had another situation. It was not resolution of violent conflict but resolution of conflicting views on whether Scotland should remain part of the United Kingdom or not. And there were discussions, negotiations, referendum about that.”
Last week, Murphy was also in Georgia, the pro-Western former Soviet state in the Caucasus which was invaded by Russia in a five-day conflict in 2008.
As minister for Europe at the time, Murphy played a key role in the UK’s response to the crisis, standing in for Foreign Secretary David Miliband while the latter was on holiday.
One senior Labour insider who worked alongside Murphy said: “It’s totally ridiculous. Jim can’t even resolve his own conflict - between the belief that he’s good and his actual ability.
“He was divisive in the referendum and inside Labour. He could start a row in an empty house. The odds on civil war breaking out in Armenia and Georgia have just shortened considerably.”
Last month the Sunday Herald revealed Murphy, 48, had set up a one-man consultancy firm called Arden Strategies Ltd, despite his reputation for lacking a clear strategy in the election.
It has now emerged that he is also hawking himself to companies as a non-executive director.
The former Eastwood MP has signed up to the nonexecutivedirectors.com website, which charges boardroom wannabes £238 for a one-year subscription and £478 for three years.
Murphy’s profile on the website says he is a “recognised problem solver with exceptional communication skills, possesses a range of contacts across the political and public policy arena and is also a member of Her Majesty's Privy Council”.
The site, which claims to be responsible for two-thirds of non-executive placements in the UK, says non-execs typically earn £15,000 to £40,000 a year for 1 or 2 days work per month.
An SNP spokesman said: “We wish Mr Murphy well in this new venture. As a former Scottish Labour leader he will have plenty of experience of conflict - though perhaps less of its resolution."
Murphy’s feud with McCluskey was notorious in Labour circles. In 2013, McCluskey called for Murphy, then the shadow defence secretary, and shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander to be sacked from Ed Miliband’s shadow cabinet.
In the wake of the general election, in which Murphy presided over the loss of 40 of Scottish Labour’s 41 seats, McCluskey also blamed Murphy for the new Conservative government.
He said Scottish Labour had not only “lost Scotland, but I think they've been responsible for making certain that the Conservatives were back in power in Westminster".
Two days later, Murphy quit as Scottish Labour leader and took a parting shot at McCluskey, saying the party should not be governed by the "grudges and grievances" of one man.
Murphy did not respond to requests for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel