IT remains a noisy and polluted legacy of the misguided ambitions of the post-war planners, the country's busiest stretch of motorway tearing through once historic and attractive neighbourhoods.
But in one of the boldest visions in a generation, plans have been hatched to physically cover the M8 as it careers through the edges of Glasgow city centre.
By far the most radical is a roof covering sections of the M8, over which a public park would be built. The park would also extend to the immediate vicinity around the A-listed Mitchell Library and onto neighbouring streets.
Although no timescales or costs have been attached at such an early stage, a report in front of the city council's decision-making executive committee next week makes repeated references to the oncoming need to upgrade the motorway infrastructure along the stretch.
Another proposal involves creating a "raised central garden" space by removing the existing slip lane, "thereby providing a new landmark green space at a key city centre gateway".
The plan echoes recent moves in New York where areas have been transformed due to parks and gardens being built on disused 'high line' rail tracks.
A covered motorway in Marbella, Spain, is also understood to have been an inspiration, while cities such as Utrecht in the Netherlands and Vancouver in Canada have recently announced similar schemes.
Much of the city council's plan for the wider area also borrows heavily from urban regeneration in Copenhagen, where whole areas have been made pedestrian and cyclist-friendly.
Amongst the other proposed projects are a further pedestrian bridge over the M8, tree-lined sections of Sauchiehall Street, dedicated cycle paths on Bath Street and Sauchiehall Street, the upgrading of Garnethill Park and the redevelopment of Renfrew Street as an ‘Avenue for the Arts’.
Also mooted are the creation of a ‘green street’ at Blythswood Street/Rose Street, the closure of the steep Scott Street to traffic and the creation of a people or recreation space, similar again to what has been achieved in cities such as New York. Charing Cross station is also recommended for a makeover, creating a concourse area and more open facing.
The report states: "The uncovered M8 cutting contributes the negative qualities of severance, noise and air pollution, while the three-lane slip roads on either side discourage anyone from doing any more than scuttling through as fast as possible.
"Change is needed to make this part of the city more pleasant and easy to walk and cycle through and to enable it to make some positive public realm contribution.
"The reality of infrastructure life cycles means that a decision needs to be taken soon about investing in replacing
elements of the existing motorway or altering it to the benefit of the city and the region."
However it adds that it faces major challenges over feasibility and cost. It claims construction or installation of the motorway 'cap' would "most likely require temporary closure of/access to the M8 in one or both directions.
And although road space in the area is often used inefficiently, even at peak times, reducing the number of lanes on the slip roads and Bath Street bridge would hit traffic capacity.
Frank McAveety, leader of Glasgow City Council, said: “This radical plan outlines an exciting new vision for the Sauchiehall and Garnethill District and a taste of what the city centre could look like in the future, setting the benchmark for modern, vibrant cities across Europe.
"These proposals will lead to improved public spaces and a better connected centre of Glasgow, fully able to capitalise on its unique assets and diversity. I look forward to the results of the forthcoming public consultation.”
A public consultation on the raft of plans will begin on November 20 and last for nine weeks. A final report will be brought back for formal approval next February.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel