THE company that wants to establish a large-scale fracking industry in Scotland has warned that it could shelve its plans and instead invest in England, after the SNP leadership narrowly avoided an embarrassing rebellion over the issue from grassroots members.
Delegates forced a vote after a conference motion, which was watered down by party HQ ahead of the conference, was seen as not going far enough by members who support a ban on unconventional oil and gas extraction in Scotland rather than the current moratorium.
Following the debate, Tom Pickering, a director of Ineos who is spearheading the firm's fracking plans north of the border, expressed frustration at a timetable published by the Scottish Government for research and a consultation which means a final decision over the issue will not be taken until 2017.
He said that an attempt to engage with party members by holding a stall at the conference had gone well, but that Ineos, which owns the sprawling Grangemouth industrial complex, could instead focus its shale gas operations in England, where the UK Government is actively encouraging fracking.
Mr Pickering added: "If you're making an investment in something, clarity is absolutely important, from start until finish. Where you don't have that clarity, where are you going to take that investment? You'll take it where it has got clarity."
Asked about whether he feared the Scottish Government would be swayed by public opinion, rather than scientific studies it has commissioned, he added: "They've made the statement that they're working with fact and science."
On the Scottish Government's timetable for further research before a decision is made, he said he believed there "could be more pace" and expressed frustration at the time taken to set out the process.
Mr Pickering added: "They've said you can do seismic [testing] and core drilling, but actually that's not the path to testing commercial flow and production. Down south, we can see a clear line of science, regulatory support, planning support to advance it along the scientific and appraisal timeline.
"Ineos has got to think carefully about where it chooses to pursue early stage investment. [Scotland] could lose that first moment where you can choose to develop the knowhow and experience and equipment that can be taken out beyond Scotland. That once in a generation opportunity is lost."
In the conference hall, a series of delegates lined up to warn against the environmental and health impacts of fracking. Fergus Ewing, the energy minister, was not present at the event.
Eventually, a move to abandon the motion and force a stronger resolution in its place was defeated by 554 votes to 427.
Meanwhile, the leadership position was defeated over the issue of land reform, with delegates unhappy at the Scottish Government's proposals which will see tax exemptions for sporting estates scrapped and the creation of a new Scottish Land Commission. Several favoured more radical policies on transparency and buy-outs.
Almost 600 delegates voted to shelve the supportive motion and force a re-think, compared to 440 who opposed the move.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel