TEST drilling for unconventional coal and gas has been given the go-ahead as part of an 18-month process to determine whether industrial-scale fracking should be allowed in Scotland.
A detailed research programme into the potential benefits and possible risks of unconventional fossil fuel extraction will be carried out between now and next summer, ministers announced, pushing a decision on the controversial technology back until after the election.
It will be followed by a four-month public consultation, allowing ministers to reach a decision after the Spring of 2017.
Details of the timetable were announced as Energy Minister Fergus Ewing bowed to pressure from within his own party and extended the existing moratorium on shale gas fracking and coal bed methane extraction to cover a third technique, underground coal gasification, or UCG.
A separate study into UCG will be conducted by Professor Campbell Gemmell, a former head of pollution watchdog SEPA.
A major protest against plans to employ UCG beneath the Firth of Forth is planned for Sunday.
The demonstration is backed by grassroots SNP members opposed to unconventional coal and gas, who have formed a pressure group called SMAUG.
Environmental campaigners Friends of the Earth welcomed the extended moratorium and lengthy decision-making process, and said they were confident it would result in a "full ban" on fracking.
However, they voiced concerns about the start of test drilling, which will be permitted as part of the research exercise.
The Scottish Government, which has previously refused to say whether test drilling would be allowed, said it would require planning consents and must take place "in collaboration" with an independent academic body with research as the "key driver".
But Dr Richard Dixon, director of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: "If companies end up paying research bodies to take part in test drilling, that would raise questions about the validity of the moratorium."
Ineos, the Grangemouth-based petrochemicals giant which has bought up extensive fracking rights across central Scotland, said it "remained supportive" of the Scottish Government's approach.
A spokesman added: "Ineos also welcomes the understanding that science based evidence gathering will also involve the need for physical testing during the moratorium."
A source said the company was pleased to see a timescale for a final decision.
Mr Ewing first announced a study and public consultation on fracking in January, when he imposed the moratorium.
It came six months after an expert scientific panel set up by the Scottish Government concluded that "significant" shale oil and gas resources could be extracted safely and would provide an economic boost.
The new study will look into the possible economic and environmental impact of fracking and consider "decommissioning and aftercare".
Announcing the process, Mr Ewing said: "We should never close our minds to the potential opportunities for Scotland from new energy technologies but we must also ensure that community, environmental and health concerns are all fully taken account of.
"The research we propose in this timetable will give all interested stakeholders important information to allow a more informed debate during the public consultation."
Patrick Harvie, leader of the Scottish Greens, said: "Today's announcement shows that consistent pressure on ministers from Greens, campaigners, communities and even members of the SNP is working."
Labour's environment spokeswoman Sarah Boyack said:
"For months now the SNP has faced the accusation of being two faced on fracking and unconventional gas by campaigning in elections on anti-fracking platforms whilst reassuring big business behind the scenes that Scotland would be open for business. "They can’t have it both ways but it looks like they're going to try to until at least after the 2016 election."
Scottish Conservative energy spokesman Murdo Fraser said:
"A recent report stated that underground coal had the potential to create a multi-billion pound industry in Scotland, supporting 5,000 jobs.
"It is disappointing that this opportunity is being put on the back-burner as a result of the SNP’s internal difficulties."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel