Nicola Sturgeon has claimed the BBC's coverage of last year's independence referendum was unfair.
The First Minister claimed the corporation only analysed the SNP's case for independence and failed to consider the consequences for Scotland of staying in the UK.
She also complained 'network' journalists, reporting the story for the whole of the UK, were poorly informed.
Delivering the Alternative McTaggart lecture at the Edinburgh International Television Festival, she launched a strongly-worded attack on the BBC.
She said: "I am not saying there was institutional bias in the BBC's referendum output.
"However, there were occasions when its coverage - through oversight, apparent ignorance of the detail of an issue or as a result of simply following the agenda of openly partisan print media - lapsed from the objective output the referendum deserved into what could seem partial and, at times, pejorative.
"I don't doubt the effort and integrity that went into the Corporation's coverage.
"And, for the record, I think that the BBC, and BBC Scotland in particular, has some of the finest political journalists in the land.
"But that was undermined on occasion by those lapses, some of which have been recognised and flagged up by the BBC's own internal processes subsequent to the vote."
She said it was right the case for independence should be analysed to a greater degree than the case for staying in the UK.
But she complained: "The status quo and the consequences of voting No were not really analysed at all."
She also said the BBC's 'network' journalists - those covering the story for the whole of the UK - came late to the campaign and "sounded less than fully informed" to audiences in Scotland.
She added: "The frustration that many felt was not borne out of a misplaced desire to control the media, but from a genuine concern that the playing field didn't always feel even."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel