IT is the day enthusiasts head to the hills along with gamekeepers and their dogs, in search of a good first day's sport to fill the game larder.
But an animal welfare charity is calling for a ban on driven grouse shooting ahead of the opening of the season across Scotland's sporting estates next week on the 'Glorious 12th'.
OneKind, a UK-wide organisation based in Edinburgh, argues that shooting grouse for sport is dependent on intensive habitat management. It claims this is damaging to protected wildlife sites and increases water pollution, flood risk and greenhouse gas emissions.
The body also underlined the link to the illegal persecution of raptors such as the hen harrier, now in serious decline. This has been linked to driven grouse shooting due to the perceived threat the harriers pose to red grouse through predation, according to the charity.
OneKind, formerly known as Advocates for Animals, said: "The shooting industry is dependent on maintaining large stocks of grouse which are shot for vast sums of money throughout the season.
"Legal, although often cruel, methods of control are available to gamekeepers for other species which predate on grouse but this is not the case with birds of prey. Illegal persecution of raptors is blighting the industry with significant levels taking place around driven grouse moors."
Events are being held around the country coinciding with start of the grouse shooting season, to raise awareness of the decline in hen harrier numbers.
OneKind spokeswoman Louise Robertson said: “We hope the public will take on board the severity of the situation and question how ethical it is that as a nation we promote the grouse shooting industry and celebrate the start of the season with the Glorious - or Inglorious as it should be known - Twelfth. “
It follows calls for a ban on driven grouse shooting made by a former conservation director of the RSPB, Mark Avery, in his recently published book 'Inglorious — Conflict in the Uplands'.
The bird charity has remained officially neutral on the issue.
However, Dr Avery claims that grouse shooting is only made possible by “illegal killing of protected wildlife such as hen harriers, peregrines and golden eagles by some estates”.
He has launched a petition calling for the Westminster government to ban the sport south of the Border, but sees the situation is better in Scotland, with some estates offering the likes of as game bird photography as an alternative.
But Ms Robertson said that as well as the obvious cruelty of an unregulated sport which allows novice and untrained sportsmen to shoot at living creatures, the hidden cruelties were numerous. These include predator control methods such as snaring.
"In the run-up to the shooting season, our countryside is literally littered with these silent killers waiting to choke, garrotte or kill many of the animals unfortunate enough to become trapped," she said.
However a spokesman for the Scottish Gamekeepers Association responded robustly: “Many organisations will be jumping on the anti-grouse bandwagon ahead of August 12 and using this to push their own organisational agendas and gain media profile.
"Lamentably, this is now indicative of the extreme end of countryside politics which has damaged trust and prevented positive joint initiatives being taken forward which would be to the benefit of Scotland’s land, conservation and the communities which depend on it for employment and wellbeing.
“There are working people and their families busting a gut just now to prepare for something which is a major source of household income and work as well as being part of the life and rhythm of the communities in which they live. While people are entitled to drive their own agendas, they should not forget real working people and families deserve respect.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel