SCOTLAND's richest man has revealed plans to resume the construction of ocean-going commercial ships on the Clyde.
In a dramatic statement of confidence in what was once thought a dying industry, billionaire Jim McColl has mooted a take-over of Britain's largest dry dock "to make big boats".
The entrepreneur has already scouted the 1000ft-long Inchgreen dock in Greenock as he looks to expand capacity beyond the Ferguson Marine, the smaller yard at nearby Port Glasgow which he saved from bankruptcy last year.
To lose so much of an important industry seems economically suicidal
Mr McColl said that just nine months after rescuing Ferguson, he was already getting "requests" to build ships bigger than those his yard can currently handle.
He stressed that he was looking at building a "broader range of ships" than the ferries that Ferguson has focused on in recent years, including military vessels and ocean-going commercial carriers.
His interest in Inchgreen – which has just been put on the market for a lease by its owners Peel Ports – comes after BAE Systems signalled that it would keep its yard at Govan in Glasgow.
Saving Scotland's last commercial shipbuilder was no flash in the pan, says McColl
Mr McColl said: "We are investing quite a bit in Ferguson to up our capacity. We are getting in the position to build four ships a year, six at a push.
"With the modifications we are making, we could make a vessel of 150 metres, even slightly bigger. That is the size of a ferry that would go from, say, Edinburgh to Zeebrugge, an ocean-going ship.
"Before we did this work, 100 metres was the maximum."
"We are bidding a broader range of ships just now, not just ferries.
"We have been inundated with proposals for vessels we can make at Ferguson.
"But there are other requests we are getting we would probably need additional capacity for.
"We would be looking to expand if we could. Govan would have been a good site to look at, if the yard had been vacant.
"We have looked at Inchgreen, the dry dock. It is a fantastic, fabulous facility, one of the biggest in Europe."
Mr McColl, who splits his time between Monaco and Glasgow, confirmed he had personally scouted the 31-acre Greenock site.
Inchgreen, designed to repair ships as big as the first Queen Mary, was opened in the early 1960s at the cost of more than £4m, half of the money provided by the UK government.
In today's money, its pricetag would be nearly £90m.
Mr McColl said: "Nobody could afford to build a dry dock like that any more. It still has its heavy cranes but, of course, would need investment."
It is not clear how much Mr McColl or other investors would have to put in to Inchgreen to make it competitive with high-end yards in Germany or Norway.
He raised the possibility of leasing it for short periods if Ferguson won orders for ships just a bit too big for its current yard.
The Inverclyde dock, was part of Scott Lithgow, the Greenock shipbuilding giant which also eventually owned Ferguson Marine.
It is currently rarely used, leased for brief periods to carry out repairs.
Owners Peel Ports, which bought out the old Clydeport, are looking to lease site, with a clear emphasis on its potential for "ship repair and marine construction", rather than the "yuppy flats" that other parts of Inverclyde's waterfront have been used for.
Mr McColl, meanwhile, hinted he would be interested in offering BAE Systems competition for defence contracts. He said: "The British government will want to keep buying military ships in the UK.
"With what we are doing, we could start getting in to military ships. A bit of competition would not be bad for BAE Systems."
BAE Systems has dropped plans for a £200m frigate factory at Scotstoun, a state-of-the-art facility that would have allowed them to free up Govan for other use.
Instead, the company has pursued what its own managers called a "sub-optimal" solution of assembling a new generation of frigates across both yards.
BAE Systems took over the Govan yard from Kvaerner, which had made commercial bulk carriers, the last large Clyde-built commercial ships.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel