HUMAN rights officials have written to Scotland's top-performing state school to highlight its duties to disabled pupils.
The UK-wide Equality and Human Rights Commission contacted Jordanhill School, in the west end of Glasgow, after it was found to have unlawfully discriminated against a pupil with special needs last year.
The school said they could not accept a boy who was disabled and had dyslexia because it could not afford to fund the levels of support he required.
However, the family took the case to the Additional Support Needs Tribunal (ASNT), which ruled Jordanhill had "unlawfully discriminated" against the pupil by refusing to offer him a place at the school.
Alastair Pringle, Scotland Director of the commission, a public quango set up in 2007, said: "The Equality Act 2010 requires a school to make reasonable adjustments for disabled children.
"Additionally, the school must ensure they don't discriminate against disabled children by treating them unfavourably because of something connected to their disability.
"As the national equality body for Scotland, the commission works to eliminate discrimination and promote equality across the nine protected grounds set out in the Equality Act 2010, including disability.
"In certain circumstances, it is appropriate for the commission to seek clarity and underline the requirements of organisations and public bodies in relation to this Act."
Jordanhill, which regularly tops exam league tables, argues it is not covered by special needs legislation in the same way as other state schools because it is the only publicly-funded mainstream secondary in Scotland not under council control and the 2004 Education (Additional Support for Learning) Act relates to local authorities.
As a result, the school says it is not funded to provide the specialist services required for some pupils with more severe additional support needs.
However, the tribunal ruled in favour of the child and said there was a need for contingency planning within the school's financial management to allow flexibility within the support for learning department.
In a statement the school said: "As the community, comprehensive school Jordanhill prides itself on its inclusiveness. In reviewing and updating the accessibility strategy the board has carefully considered and incorporated recent guidance for schools from Scottish Government, along with feedback from the tribunal.
"That strategy reinforces our commitment to all our young people having access to positive learning environments and opportunities to develop their knowledge, skills, ambition, confidence and self-esteem to their fullest potential.
"Understanding and planning to meet the needs of all children prior to entry is an essential element of this process and we seek support from everyone engaging with a young person to do this.
"In the ASL Act the Scottish Parliament has determined that the school should be treated like all other Grant Aided schools. While the school seeks at all times to operate within the spirit of the Act, the school is not a local authority and has neither the powers nor the resources of a local authority."
Formerly run by Jordanhill College of Education as a demonstration school, Jordanhill it is now funded directly by a grant from the Scottish Government rather than through the local authority.
The school is non-denominational and non-fee paying, but has one of the most exclusive catchment areas in Scotland with only residents who live in a list of prescribed addresses allowed entrance.
The affluent nature of its catchment area is reflected by figures showing that 64 per cent of its pupils come from the richest neighbourhoods in Scotland, with just five per cent from the poorest.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article