MSPs have rejected assisted suicide by voting against a Bill which would have made it legal for terminally ill people to request help to die.
The Assisted Suicide Bill was defeated by 82 votes to 36 in the Scottish Parliament.
Patrick Harvie, Green MSP for Glasgow, brought forward the Bill which was drafted and introduced by the late Margo MacDonald before she died last year.
Mr Harvie had said the bill could be improved and urged MSPs to allow it to continue to the next stage and for the details to be debated to make it better.
He said: "I think the case has been made very clear that a change in the law has been justified.
"Whatever view members take of the detailed operation of this legislation were we to pass it, I hope that all members who understand the basic principle, who accept the idea that human beings have the right to make a decision in circumstances such as a terminal or life-shortening illness, I hope that members will give this Bill the opportunity to come forward to the next stage, and then we can begin to debate the amendments that come forward."
Mr Harvie said he was not asking anyone to "approve of suicide" but to "widen the choices" of people.
The Scottish Parliament Health Committee however said it couldn't support the Bill and Health Secretary Shona Robsion, speaking in a personal capacity said she too was not able to vote for assisted suicide.
Speaking on behalf of the committee Glasgow SNP MSP Bob Doris said it had taken evidence from patients and doctors for and against allowing assisted suicide.
He said the committee was not persuaded.
Ms Robison said there was insufficient safeguards and insufficient provision for licensed facilitators and she was not able to support the bill.
Instead she called for greater emphasis to be placed on providing the best end of life care.
Ms Robison said: "Everyone should receive high quality palliative care. We must focus on that."
MSPs spoke for and against the Bill and then had a free vote based on their own conscience.
Many backed the Bill but others said they wanted improved palliative care.
From the Conservatives, Jackson Carlaw said it was intended for people not to suffer in the future, while Nanette Milne said she found it "deeply disturbing".
Labour's Mary Fee said it was about giving people control over their own destiny, while Michael McMahon said in the Netherlands assisted suicide had become the "default mode of death" for cancer patients and urged against voting for the bill.
SNP MSP Mike McKenzie was in favour stating "if we have the means to alleviate suffering we should do so."
John Mason, Shettleston MSP, said he was concerned about coercion. He said the BMA said there was no way to guard against it.
He said it opened up opportunities for older people to think they were a burden and said lives could be threatened by the legislation if passed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article