A second independence referendum should not be held for at least 15 years, according to a group of devolution experts.
The academics also warn that the SNP's call for 'devo max', or full fiscal autonomy, would break up the Union, in a new report published today.
Called A Constitutional Crossroads: Ways Forward for the United Kingdom it calls for the abolition of the Barnett formula, which helps to calculate the block grant to Scotland, because it does not offer a fair solution across the UK. .
The group also recommend a new 'charter of the Union' to protect the UK, English votes for English laws at Westminster and greater decentralisation within England.
Last night the SNP said that a second referendum on independence would be a matter for future Holyrood elections and the Scottish people.
Last week SNP sources suggested that Scottish ministers did not need David Cameron's permission to hold another vote.
Technically, the legal right to stage a referendum lies with Westminster.
In recent days the Prime Minister has outlined his opposition to another vote.
But the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said he has no right to rule one out.
The report, compiled by experts including Professor John Kay, a former adviser to Alex Salmond, Prof Sir Jeffrey Jowell, director of the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, Prof Linda Colley, from Princeton University, Prof Adam Tomkins, from Glasgow University, Prof Tony Travers, from the London School of Economics and devolution expert Alan Trench, suggests a Scottish independence referendum be held "no more than once in a generation.... (and) a generation should be considered at least 15 years."
On devo max, the SNP's preferred option, it warns: "Such an extreme form of devolution would seem designed not to preserve the Union with the rest of the United Kingdom, but to break it."
The report recommends a new 'charter of the Union', enforceable by the courts.
The present Barnett formula governing funding arrangements for the devolved governments "does not deliver equity between the various parts of the UK" it concludes.
"The way forward is a grant mechanism based on clear criteria such as relative need with a discount for devolved taxraising powers and subject to periodic reviews," it adds.
Earlier this week a Royal Society of Edinburgh working group called for an overhaul of the Barnett Formula, despite fears such a move could see Scotland lose billions of pounds.
SNP Justice and Home Affairs spokesman Joanna Cherry said: "Westminster needs to deliver the additional powers which Scotland has been promised - and the recent election result is a huge mandate for further powers beyond those recommended by the Smith Commission.
"In terms of a second independence referendum, that is a matter for future Holyrood elections, and whether or not there will be one is ultimately a matter for the people of Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article