VETERANS of a Nato exercise that went wrong killing five Scots-based part-time soldiers in Germany believe there has been a 40-year cover-up of what caused the tragedy.
A German police report reveals for the first time that the British military was accused of criminal negligence in Exercise Bold Guard, which was carried out over the Kiel Canal 40 years ago today.
The deaths of the 15th Scottish Parachute Battalion soldiers and a sixth soldier from the Liverpool-based 4th Battalion in 1974 was described at the time as the worst peace-time tragedy to ever befall a territorial unit.
Veterans say that reports surrounding official inquiries into what happened have never been released, despite requests.
Two military courts of inquiry were set up to determine why the experienced members of the part-time parachute force died in what should have been a routine night operation.
Tonight a service will be held at a monument in the north-west Germany village of Sehestedt in memory of victims Captain Gerald Muir, Officer Cadet James Cooper, Sergeant Richard Tomkins, Sergeant Eliot Leask, Lieutenant Corporal Brian Bett and Private Edward Beech.
Some 28 people representing both battalions, including veterans, flew from Edinburgh Airport yesterday to pay their respects on the 40th anniversary. They included Maureen Collison and Norma Cooper, sisters of Officer Cadet Cooper.
The men drowned when they came down too far north of their landing zone and hit the dark waters of the Kiel Canal amongst boats. One soldier was reported to have been hit by the propellor of a vessel.
They were among 15 paratroopers and four platforms that had plunged into the canal. Other soldiers were injured.
In a brief written answer to an MP's question asking about the joint Royal Air Force and Army Board of Inquiry, then Defence Secretary Roy Mason said that after an "exhaustive examination" it was decided the reason for the tragedy was that the wind at the time was stronger and more southerly than had been forecast.
Jim Carey, 67, a veteran who flew in the mission and landed safely, said he believed the full reports of what happened have been covered up because they would reveal negligence on the part of those who decided to make the drop.
Mr Carey, a retired platoon sergeant from Coatbridge, says he is one of a number of soldiers who requested details of reports and was told they would not be released. He said: "I think the German police report is evidence of either wrongdoing or negligence."
Mr Carey, who will be at tonight's service, added: "It should have been stopped, there were red flares going up. I think they were flying because the heavy drop was landing everywhere. It wasn't just down to wind we were just dropped to early."
The report reveals for the first time that German police believed there should be criminal proceedings around what happened, saying that due to a "not yet known error" the soldiers jumped too early.
The unit with 540 paratroopers and 26 platforms were dropped, but 25 soldiers and some platforms landed directly into the canal.
"During the hours after the drop there seemed to be complete chaos among the troops present at the Kiel Canal" said the report.
A criminal investigation concluded: "The result of the criminal investigations here points to the fact that German institutions, authorities or persons do not carry any responsibility for the accident." It blamed the errors on human failure by the British.
A memo by a senior public prosecutor in Germany urged the authorities to carry out a prosecution in the UK, if the act was an offence under British law - as it was in Germany.
The MoD was unable to provide details of reports to The Herald on request. It said it had no record of any requests made by any party for the records of the military exercise, or the court of inquiry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article