A former chief executive of the Scotch Whisky Association has complained of intimidation from senior SNP members and claimed other business leaders have suffered such pressure during the referendum campaign.
Gavin Hewitt said challenges to the Scottish Government's views on independence were regrettably rebuffed too often by dismissal of the messenger. "Sometimes it goes as far as intimidating calls from senior SNP members," he said. "That is not a good basis on which the electorate should decide Scotland's future on September 18."
He stressed the intimidation directed at him by Nationalists had not been in the context of the independence referendum, but he said: "I do know people who have had calls in the context of the independence debate. But for obvious reasons I'm not going to indicate who. It does go on unfortunately."
Mr Hewitt said intimidation by the SNP had been "prevalent" but business people were not willing to talk about it, adding: "The message was - get out of this debate."
He said the emails from SNP special advisor Campbell Gunn about carer Clare Lally "amount to that sort of thing."
Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael said he talked to business leaders all the time and they told him independence would be bad for their firms but it would also be "bad for their businesses to get on the wrong side of the Scottish Government". He claimed: "The Campbell Gunn intervention is entirely consistent with that pattern."
Last night, an SNP spokesman said in response: "We encourage every single person to get involved in the referendum debate if they wish to - it is a fantastic opportunity for Scotland - and there are vigorous contributions from business people and others virtually on a daily basis which receive widespread attention.
"Some of these are opposed to independence and some are for; for example, the pro-Yes Business for Scotland organisation, which has some 2000 members.
"We have no knowledge of the calls to which Mr Hewitt refers and would urge him to participate in the debate if he wants to, just as he is a very vocal opponent of minimum pricing for alcohol."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article