THE National Trust for Scotland has come under fire for hiring staff on controversial zero-hours contracts.
Union leaders have accused the body, which looks after some of Scotland's greatest buildings, of eroding employment rights and paying "poverty wages".
The Prospect union is calling on NTS members and the Scottish Government to back its call for better conditions.
The Trust brought in zero-hours contracts, which guarantee neither hours nor pay, for the first time this year.
The NTS insists that it uses the terms sparingly and feedback from staff and managers indicates that they have "worked well".
Of the 1300 staff who worked with the Trust over the summer, 83 were on zero-hours contracts.
The union has accused NTS of trying to erode a system whereby many seasonal staff returned to the NTS year after year.
It wants NTS to pay all staff at least the Scottish living wage - £7.45 an hour.
An NTS spokesman said that in recent years the Trust had invested "significantly" to improve pay for its staff and was committed to phasing in the Scottish Living Wage over four years.
On zero-hours contracts, he said: "Feedback from both staff and managers indicates that this has worked well over the summer providing extra support for properties at busy times."
l Organisers of the Mobo music awards in Glasgow have been criticised over the use of unpaid volunteers to prepare for next month's ceremony.
General secretary of the union Bectu Gerry Morrissey said the organisers of the Music of Black Origin awards were "steeped" in equality and should not be "exploiting" people.
Mobo said that in Glasgow it had been working with Young Scot to provide opportunities for a small number of young volunteers to learn valuable life skills.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article