A man who tripped and fell into a historic boundary ditch within the grounds of a stately home while taking his grandson on a guided bat walk has been awarded £8750 damages.
John Cowan badly fractured his right ankle after falling into a ha-ha ditch at Hopetoun House on the outskirts of Edinburgh on September 5, 2008, as he and his grandson returned to a car park in the dark.
Mr Cowan, a former water quality manager who was 61 at the time, raised an action seeking compensation at the Court of Session in Edinburgh against the Hopetoun House Preservation Trust and trustees, including the Marquess of Linlithgow.
Damages were agreed at £35,000, but liability was contested and a hearing of evidence was subsequently heard.
A judge has now ruled the trust was liable for the injury suffered by Mr Cowan of Livingston, West Lothian, but the amount should be reduced by 75%. Mr Cowan's five-year-old grandson, Ross, also fell, biting his lip in the incident.
Mr Cowan, who was recovering from an operation for thyroid cancer, had gone on the organised walk to search for bats armed with a torch as instructed. He had never been to the historic house, nor was he familiar with the layout of the grounds.
"I didn't know what a ha-ha was beforehand. It was a [ditch] to keep animals from leaving an area in country parks," he said.
The walk ended at a ranger's centre and Mr Cowan said he immediately took his grandson to the toilet. He did not hear any instructions how to get back to the car park.
Countryside ranger Peter Stevens told the court he had gathered the group inside the centre and given directions to the car park. He did not notice Mr Cowan and his grandson going to the toilet. Had he done so, he said, he would have given individual instruction on returning to the car park.
Lord Bracadale said in his judgment: "I find the pursuer [Mr Cowan] did not hear these directions, no doubt because he was engaged in attending to the needs of Ross. I consider that Mr Stevens must be mistaken in thinking he had checked everyone was present when he gave the directions."
Mr Cowan ended up walking in the dark on a route that took him to a point in the ha-ha where there was a 5ft drop.
Lord Bracadale said he considered the ha-ha was outside the scope of the law over obvious dangers such as cliffs or canals where an occupier was not required to take precautions against a person being injured.
"It is an unusual feature of a concealed nature, particularly in the dark. While the ha-ha was a permanent feature of the landscape at Hopetoun House, it is an unusual feature about which someone crossing the lawn in the dark would be likely to be unaware," he said.
He added: "It seems to me it was reasonably foreseeable a member of the group might, albeit carelessly, take a short cut across the grass to the car park."
The judge said it would have involved no sacrifice to take the group to the front of the house and clearly point out the route.
But he said: "Leaving the path in the dark to walk across open ground was a careless thing to do.
"The pursuer could not have been keeping a proper lookout; if he had, he would have been likely to have spotted the ha-ha when he came across it.
"The top of the ha-ha was edged with stone."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article