A FARMERS' leader has accused ministers of backing down on a promise to take the case of a farmer who lost a long-running land dispute to the UK Supreme Court.
Andrew Riddell, 52, was found dead last week before he was due to leave the land his family had farmed for 100 years.
It came after Mr Riddell's landlord successfully overturned a land court ruling that had given tenure to the father of four.
In the upheld appeal, senior judge Lord Gill ruled that measures put in place to protect tenants in such areas were not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
Angus McCall, chairman of the Scottish Tenant Farmers' Association, of which Mr Riddell was a director, has described his "incredulity" that the SNP Government may not follow up on its plans to appeal the ruling at Britain's highest court.
He said the death of Mr Riddell, from Peaston Farm in Ormiston, East Lothian, in a non-suspicious incident had cast a gloom over the rural community.
Mr McCall added that he was shocked and dismayed to hear the Government may not proceed with its appeal.
He said it had been indicated a Government legal challenge was certain and his association was even told it had been lodged last April, with the prospect it would be fast-tracked for a hearing next spring.
The Herald has now established it is by no means certain this appeal to the UK Supreme Court will take place.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The Scottish Government is currently considering its position following the conclusion of the Salvesen v Riddell court proceedings.
"The death of Mr Riddell is shocking and tragic and it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time."
Lord Gill's ruling shocked the Government and the land reform lobby in equal measure as it gave precedence to the right to property under the European Convention on Human Rights over whether a public interest argument was proportionate and compatible.
Land campaigner Andy Wightman said he too had been led to assume the ruling would be challenged, saying it would be disgraceful if ministers failed to put up a fight for the will of the Scottish Parliament.
He said: "They have a duty and an obligation to make a decision on this and I am of the firm view that it has to be to fight this through the UK Supreme Court.
"I don't understand why this is dragging on.
"It is right that human rights are observed and that laws are subject to judicial intervention. Unfortunately in this case, not enough was done early on to prevent landowners circumventing the law.
"Attempts to do so retro- spectively have now proved unlawful. It is now time for the Scottish Government to decide whose side it is on in the unequal class struggle between landlords and tenants."
Mr Riddell's battle began in 2003 when he was given notice to quit by landowner Alastair Salvesen, who bought the farm in 1998.
The problem stemmed from an outdated law that left the family few rights despite being on the land since 1902.
Mr Riddell's funeral will take place tomorrow with a service of thanksgiving at Yester Parish Church in Gifford, East Lothian.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article